Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Report generation (Current solutions (Serner, Butterfly ultrasound systems…
Report generation
-
User Interview
-
-
-
-
-
Step by step report generation process with detailed number of steps, customization options,
-
Apart from the report, what all documents need to be stored in the system? Pre-designed templates required or not
-
User Insights
-
Both the hands of the doctor are occupied when conducting the procedure so switching from diagnosis to screen settings can become difficult
Sometimes when there is noise in the room, some important observations are missed during the procedure which are asked to the doctor later after the completion of diagnosis
Tend to loose information when pedal is not pressed properly, When in haste (high cognitive load) tend to forget few findings - Human error
-
Endoscopy is much faster procedure than EUS which takes about 2 to 15 min depending on the complexity of the case
The person writing the report use the proper medical terms in the report as per their prior experience
Screenshots are taken at the points doctor ask to, along with the fixed points in the wole process of endoscopy
Requirements
-
-
-
Previous report for reference and history of the patient - Usually referred from the hard copy of reports before going for the procedure
-
-
Habitat Study
-
At the time of endoscopy, the lights of the procedure room are dim so that doctor can concentrate on the screen properly without any other visual disturbance.
-
Switching between the screens (EUS - ultrasound and normal live feed), color (Red and blue) is done vi single click function
-
Report generation system is kept at one corner of the procedure room with a printer attached where doctor sits at the end and feed the findings in the pre-designed report templates
Product team interviews
-
-
-
Overall scope
Report generation, editing, distribution
-
-
-
-
-
-