Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
FES for Muscle Restoration in CP patients (Effects (Need to provide more…
FES for Muscle Restoration in CP patients
Design
Non-invasive
Reference control technique
Low cost FES
Close loop system
Allow automatic configuration by controller
Effects
Need to provide more clinically relevant results
Children with no visual, cognitive or behavioral impairements
FES isn't a cure, but assistive.
Limited subjects recruited
No long term implications explained
Biomechanical outcomes with CP patients
Gaps in clinical knowledge and age factor
No comparison between FES & no FES
No muscle tone reduction
FES Over TENS
Only induce muscle activity
No reduction in muscle spasticity
No effectiveness over conventional gait rehabilitation methods
Work with sensory nerves only and mild
Non-availability in Pakistan
No practical implication so no better living standards
It can induce good effects if introduced here
Advancement is required in the arena of multi-channel devices.
No target for major muscle group