You’re not a lawyer, but you’ll be working with contracts and other legal documents when you sell a property. If you don’t know what you’re doing, or if you make a mistake, the consequences could be serious. You could, for example, face fines, complaints, and potential cancellation of your licence. On the other hand, if you work within the law, you and your clients and customers will be protected. We all have to meet very high standards, which are based on three areas of the law.
-
-
When things go wrong
To illustrate the importance of understanding, and complying with, the relevant laws that affect people working in real estate, let’s look at some real-life cases. You’ll find it helpful to have a copy of the Code handy: we recommend you read through the rules of the Code mentioned in each case.
A salesperson started marketing a property for sale without getting an agency agreement signed by the client (vendor) first. She was held to have breached rules 5.1, 5.2 and 9.6 of the Code. She also breached section 126 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. This meant that if the property sold neither she nor her agency would have been entitled to any commission on the sale. Her only punishment in this case was a reprimand from the Real Estate Authority Complaints Assessment Committee.
A salesperson incorrectly advertised a property as being on a cross lease title, when in fact it was a fee simple (freehold) title. When she prepared to market the property, she didn’t get a certificate of title or any other evidence to confirm the property was a cross lease. As a result, she was found guilty of a breach of rule 5.1 of the Code and fined $1,000.
A salesperson advertised a property as fully fenced. However, the fencing didn’t accurately reflect the boundary of the property, because it was partly built on Department of Conservation land. This breached rules 6.4 and 10.7 of the Code. He was fined $5,000 and ordered to pay costs to the complainant totalling more than $3,000.
Two salespeople were found guilty of unsatisfactory conduct because they failed to disclose to a purchaser that the property was at risk of flooding. They had also told the purchaser that the property could be used as a home and income, which it couldn’t. Further, they also told the purchaser that he was in a multi-offer situation when he was the only one making an offer. One salesperson was fined $7,000 and the other fined $5,000. In this case the salespersons breached rules 5.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 and 10.7.
-