Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
How did each juror impact the case?? Include examples and page numbers! .,…
How did each juror impact the case?? Include examples and page numbers! .
Juror 1
Juror 1 always organizes jury during the votes,representing everyones opinion.
Juror 1 is, and probably will be known, to be one of the jurors that kept this whole jury room and case into order. Without juror 1, who knows what the outcome of this case could have been.
He helps maintatin organization and order between the jurrors and in the room.
organizes votes
people asked him questions and sometimes asked him for permission to do things
Juror 2
He had the watch to do the time to see how long it took for the old man to get to the door from his bedroom. Juror 2 had brought up the fact about the way the knife wound was.
Juror 2 showed that the boy didn't make the stab wound. The father was taller than the boy, and he wouldn't crouch down to get killed. The angle of the wound did not match. Page 60-61
Always offers the cough drops to the 10th juror
Gets interogated by juror 10 for changing his vote to not guilty. He trembles and doesn't come up with an direct answer
Juror 4
Made a solid case with good evidence until his last point was proved that it could be wrong because the women didn't have her glasses on in the middle of the night so she wouldn't have been able to see the killing easily and it could have been a blur. Page 69-71
Juror 4 tries to convince the other jurors that the boy is guilty by talking about him not remembering the movies he saw and who was in them. That was later debunked by Juror 8.
4 was very respectful of the other jurors. He realized that the other jurors' claims and evidence were strong and ended up changing his vote to not guilty and the last few minutes
details are very important and he goes over them
Juror 5
Gave info on how the kids life was growing up, having grown up the same way. He shows that the suspected way the murder happened would not have been accurate. He would get offended by juror 10's insults towards his life, how kids from the slums are idiotic animals that dont care for human life
Juror 5 proves that the knife was not used in the way the prosecution and jury thought it was used in.
Grew up in the slums and relates to the boy. He gave information about the switchblade that nobody else would know.
5 related to the boy because he as well grew up living in the slums. He was apart of many conflict with ten as ten made many prejudice comments about people who came from "That part of town". since he grew up in the dangerou parts of town he understood the proper grips and mechanic of a switchblade
proved it was impossible to stab his father like that because thats not how a switchblade is used when youre that short
he brought up the fact that the way the boy stabbed his father was an awkward position
Page 61, knife and how it is properly used
Juror 6 -
Juror 6 had told juror 8 that he had never been more wrong in his life. Then he switched his vote
He helped 9 prove the woman lied in court by rubbing his nose and answering juror 9's questions
.
Jury 6 defends jury 9 and he fights with jury 11
He helped Juror 9 by answering every single question that was coming at him, and he was trying to show him that the women had lied in court, and for him to switch his vote.
He was very quiet throughout the whole story, until the end of the story where he made a big point and basically proving to the jury that the woman who "saw the boy get murdered" was lying and was wrong by proving that she had glasses and couldn't of see the boy getting killed with bad vision. Pg (69-70)
-Sean Sansone
He brought up the fact that the women had deep marks on her nose from the eye glasses she wears. This helps switch Juror 4 to non-guilty. He said that she doesn't wear glasses to bed, and couldn't see the boy from the street
He proved that the woman ,that so called, saw the boy murder his father, wrong. Page 69 and 70.
Juror 9 brought up the point that the woman had creases in the sides of her nose, possibly from wearing glasses. He also made a point that people don't wear their glasses to bed. This means that she couldn't've seen the killing from 60 feet away. -sophia
Juror 11 ask why did boy return home after 3 hours after murder. Later he changed vote to "not guilty"
Juror 11 had gotten juror number 7 to say his reason that he switched
Juror 12
Was not very decisive. He switched his vote four times from guilty, to non-guilty, to guilty again, to non-guilty again. And everytime he switched his vote and someone would ask why he did it. He would always so he didn't know.
Did not talk a lot.
He was guilty throughout the play and didn't have any reasons of being on that side because he did not talk a ton.
He kept switching his vote, and looked like he was under pressure for switching his votes
Juror 9
to stab him