Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Regional Leadership (regional leadership (Russia as a regional leader…
Regional Leadership
regional leadership
Russia as a regional leader
even democracy will not help to build a leadership
Russia is not working on its regional leadership
The frozen conflicts on the postsoviet space
the opposite way from the leadership
no consensus on the concept
what the author means by the concept
Leaders and those who challange thir leadership
countries more like objects
BUT small countries matter
but the followers matter themselves
do they want to follow?
relations may be build on different resourses
money
power and thretening
Russia threaten the allies
the power of attraction
the ideas and the ability of the leader to create attractive ideas
positive image of the leader
china as a regional leader
conceptualisation of the term
preconditions for the leadership
developing a framework
risining power
Eurasia
they structurises the neighbour spaces
how they do it? by what means?
regional leader
genuine regional leadership is a rear case
studing relations of the leader and the neighbour space
not mixed with cooperation and partnership
leadership is based on social contract
LEADER
managing the changes in the envitonment
agenda and innovations
ability to self-constraining
the followers should take you as a leader
potentially leadership is less costly than hegemony
the role of the leader should match with other leaders
the leaders are strutegically linked
otherwise they will negatively affect each other
reputation building
how we can measure it
rare type
difficult to achieve
all the conditions should be met at once
hegemony is domination without the contract and legitimacy
the crisis of neo-liberal world order
China initiatives in Central Asia
is it leadership?
common values
fair interaction
China don't want to be leader only in one region
Assimetric Leadership
development assistance
environment protection
no specidfic projects
regional initiatives
finance
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
Russia is a member of the Bank
China has 26% voting shares
leader in specific areas
measure
common international organisations and institutions
use of material resourses for rational stimulus
ideational framework
SCO Shanghai Cooperation org
buget (the lager one)
Conter terrorism cooperation
Central Asian countries are interested in cooperation
economic cooperation
China providing loans to Central Asia Countries
Silc Road Economic Belt
not an institution
infrustructure
damaging envitonment and not encreasing emploiment for local population
competition btw China and Russia in Central Asia
speculations on eurasia
Russia
soft power
hard power
global power or a regional power
economic resourses and ideas
leadership may link the ideas and resourses
resourses may be more effective with the ideas
the Ukraine issue
Eurasian Union
institutionalisation of the leadership
Russia and Belarus
limitations
sanctions
domestic challenges in Russia
Russian domestic politics is likely to be unstable
internal difficulties to manage the modernisation
appearing as a junior partner for China
benefits
historical resourses
the links that are build through migration
Is Russian international politics predictible?
China
for EU the countreis of Eastern Europe are more important than Russia
are there other countries that are also important
Ukraine
Poland
Russian centric discourse
do they have the regional leadership aspirations?
Russian influence in PostSoviet Space
influence is increasing
Russia is an important actor for all the postsoviet space
Even the EEU copy the institutions of EU
it provoces the resistance
leader creates the rules that are self-enforced
the leader crreate the conditions and the rules
cooperation
new rules implementation
the allies try to conterbalance the influence
what are the sourses for institutional creativity?
sone rules are not self-enforcible
the leadership is declining
the new regional order in the PostSoviet space
Russia can try to create it
we can start with the creation of a regional new order
creating new coalitions in world regions
the balance of power will change
Russian resourses are limited
only 8 allies for Russia
what postsoviet leaders whant form Russia?
they need russian help to stay in power
BUT Ukrainian case shows that Russia cannot be the relieble partner
non-democratic system cannot commit to folow the rules
??? not true
russian internationa politics is influenced by the internal politics
but other countries are in the same situation
How we can mesure the leadership resourses?
qualitative or quantitive
up to 60 allies for the USA
Russia shoud try to influence the choise
domination is contrproductive
russia change the priorities for the postsoviet space
Russia cannot create the self-enforcing rules for the region
not all the countries follow it
East Europe
Eastern Partnership (2008)
potential for EU enlargement
preparation for enlargenment
the negative case of Ukraine (2013-2014)
positive case with Armenia (2015)
EU Assosiation
EEU membership
groving economic desintigration with the Russian market
EaP countries have to choose the market to entry
Russian attitude towards eastern European countries differ
Rational World Order
China concept
nobody understand what is One Road One Belt
but it is still used
international discoursive power
academia, political, white papers
it is the project of internal China development
nobody can join it
rationality is used to describe the current international order
the notion of old order dissapeared form chinise discourse
they want a new more just and rational world order
law
the normative understanding of law was not common for China justice system
to justify the flexible approach
the problem of law and its implementation
rationality = just order
rationality is a balance btw the authoritarian prescriptions and relevant circumstamces
rationality
the initiative to include rationality - is the Chinise one
New World Order should be more rational
how this vision will influence the China international politics
how we can build a world order on rationality?
China has no international strategy and it is a secret
Chiniase documents don't have any maps of Silk Road
But everybody believes that they have a strategy
friendly neutrality for conflict issues like Crimea
Justice in Chiniease position towards Russia, not fully neutral
China is not using soft power
China tryes to pose the new discourse on international arena
Ex: Human Rights for China - are rights of a nation
it poses Chinease agenda on International level
Russian concept
2005 the tirm rationality was not used
Russia did not want to participate in Yellow See conflict
Russia understands that cooperation with China is not good for Russian international image
Russian turn to East is not only to China
Security Eurasian Continent
Crisis of international Order
Liberal Rule based international order
Systematic attempt is needed
contradiction between legitimacy and efficiency
two forms of legitimacy
arise of revisionists states
на экспертном уровне идет война интерпретация (И.М. Бусыгина)
где критерии именования ситуации?
к вопросу о властной силе дискурса
UN framework is set