Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

TOK Presentation (RLS Development (TV Show: Scientists said they…

- - - - https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/scientists-are-baffled-whats-up-with-the-universe/2019/10/31/31fc42e4-f353-11e9-8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html
    - - Its about space right, specifically looking at mapping out millions of universes --> how can we develop this knowledge and what factors make us trust and place faith in their claims?
        
        TOK Concepts
        
        Faith
        
        Truth?
        
        Justification
        
        Logic? / Evidece
        
        Role of evidence & justification in developing out knowledge? (+ accepting) concepts
        
        Reasoning
        
        Inductive Reasoning
      - What is the effect of authority and power on the development of accepted knowledge? --> why do we easily believe a scientist say from NASA claiming the universe (something we cannot see) is expanding whilst possibly neglecting the ideas of other scientists due to their backgrounds/ etc
        
        TOK Concepts
        
        Authority
      - In the past a lot of ideas that are now accepted and provide out fundamental knowledge were neglected due to (most of the time) religion at the time --> yet over time (usually when the person dies) new information or a new person reiterates their prior claims and it is accepted. Why do we accept it later as against when first proposed
        
        TOK Concepts
        
        Knowledge Claim
        
        Evidence
        
        Perspectives
        
        Maybe uncertainty or certainty
        
        Intuition
      - Somethign with Sense Perception and why we are able to place faith in claims about things we dont see/ touch/hear -- TRUST PRocess of natural sciences when we cant observe
        
        Concepts Found Throughout Ideas:
        
        Role of evidence and justification in developing and accepting knowledge claims
        
        The impact of perspectives on the development and ability to place trust/faith in knowledge claims (theories or concepts about things we can't sense)
        
        Scientific Knowledge
        
        Intuition in science --> to what extent do scientists place faith in intuition to develop scientific knowledge (
    - - To what extent does faith play a role in developing scientific knowledge about concepts we will not experience in our lifetime (no ability to see, touch, hear, smell, etc)
      - What role do perspectives have on influencing the development o scientific knowledge
        (hinder vs benefits?)
      - What determines if a scientific theory is justified (or maybe like accepted or true or smth) when we cannot (no sense perception) it
      - To what extent does intuition play a role in developing scientific theories about things we cannot experience.
        Idk
  - - - In this day and age we know so much about the causes of things like pollution yet why is it that countries continue to neglect this knowledge and continue to harm the planet?
      - To what extent do we as a society allow people in power to neglect knowledge and like why do we allow this?
- - - - Why is it we accept information from an authority figure but disregard the same information from another?
    - - Faith allows the development of scientific knowledge to surpass the limit of our senses.
        
        Atoms
        
        Sound / light waves
        
        Counter Claim
        
        Sense perception creates certainty beyond the limits of faith in knowledge