Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Fisher, image - Coggle Diagram
Fisher
KYOTO
MEGABARE
rejected by 131 economists, including 16 professors.
overstating costs, underestimating benefits of emission reduction.
-
locking australia into a fossil fuel based economic structure while the rest of the world shifts to low emission energy will be damaging to our longer term economic interests.
industry funded - Exonn, Mobil, Texaco, Coal, aluminum
-
-
Used by Howard in Kyoto - said that Australians will lose 20% of their income if we reduce pollution
-
-
-
we were a disgrace, even for the UK and US.
-
No one country can have a significant impact, no global ethical responsibility, not a short term issue. Sovereignty. Each nation for themselves.
Australian action would be bad for the climate because industry will move offshore to more dirty sources
-
-
-
Review of Treasury Modelling Australia's low pollution future Senate Committee on Fuel and Energy (2009)
-
-
-
-
-
-
