Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
IMCMCG3 How to Analyze a Case? (Description of process (Hypothesis(45min),…
IMCMCG3 How to Analyze a Case?
Case analysis as a process
Ask questions about the case
Seek answer
Active reading
1
Point of view
Her dilemma should be your dilemma.
Consider the character's strengths,responsibilities,and blind spots.
Goal of analysis
combine with a time limit
familiar with the information
conclusion about the main issue
have evidence
thought about other possible conclusions
Hypothesis
a tentative explanation
a set of facts
can be tested by further investigation
Description of process
Hypothesis(45min)
Decision
Review the decision options
Apply the criterion that seems to identify the most evidence in the case
Evaluation
Review the criteria you have come up with so far
What are the terms of the evaluation going to be
Problem
Make sure you know the problem that needs to be diagnosed
Think about the frameworks that seem most appropriate to the situation
Proof and action(40min)
add to the evidence you have first.
then go back in to the assess where evidence is missing.
also give some thought to the actionable content to your position
think in peactical, real world terms.
Questions(15min)
Problem
Decision
have valuable information
Use a pencil or pen to mark up the case
record new questions that come to mind
Evaluation
Situation(5min)
seen it roughly
record in detail
What is the situation?
Alternatives(15min)
to question your own hypothesis
being wrong is to ask yourself what the alternative is.
Through mistakes,we learn more.
hypothesis is not wrong.
have overlooked important information or not used specialized tools effectively.
four types of situations
Rules
Four rules
Financial rules
Accounting rules
Information rules
Learning rules
compare the qualitative methods
If a qualitative methods relevant to a situation is a applied to the same set of facts in a way consistent with the generally understood meaning of it concepts
everyone will not necessarily come up with the same results
If the right rule is applied and correctly performed.
The rule will not involve a controversial assumption.
Two people infer from the same numerical results can diverge.
An idiosyncratic assumption has no material effect on the result of a calculation.
Note that the arugement is about assumption, not about the rules themseleves.
For rules analysis, you need to know.
The data necessary to execute the rule.
The correct way to apply the rule.
The appropriate rule to furnish that information.
The type of information needed in a situation.
Evaluations
it include both positive and negative sides
a leader has strengths and weakness which are included in an accurate evaluation
there may be aspects of the leader's performance which are ambigious
Ex.One has delegated power widely, but it's too early to tell whether the managers below him can handle it
require appropriate criteria
for assessing worth, value,or effectiveness
evaluative criteria are inferred from the particulars of a situation
with the help from specialized methods
Ex.evaluate a company's financial performance can be undertaken with a long list of financial formulas
Decisions
Relevant evidnce
Decision criteria
The criteria are used to developed evidence to complete decision analysis.
The goal is to determine it creates the best fit between the available evidence and the criteria.
Decision options
As soon as you encounter a stated decision, you should for a statement of the alternative.
If they are not stated,find some plausible decision options.
Only better no best decision.
Problems
Success can also be a problem in the special meaning used here.
the three different market segments but don't know why
the heavily beaten country recover and exceed the performance, but don't know why
Realized a problem exists and then define it for yourself.
Sppecialized methods are needed
Work out an explanation of the problem.
By the linking the outcome to its root causes
Something important has happened ,but we do not know
Two retail customers suddenly got large AP, but don't know why.
A worthwhile and well-prepared change, but failed.
correct way
start thinking before reading
ask questions about the content
seek answers in the case itself
start thinking how they relate to each other and to the big picture of the case
G3
蔡彤欣
郭欣宜
黃思綺
黃意真
李宥叡