Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
MindMap of PeerReview (Students write 1st draft in class. (Students type…
MindMap of PeerReview
Students write 1st draft in class.
Students type 2nd draft at home (making the work legible).
Students trade essays in class and using highlighters and pencils, review each others work for claim, main ideas, evidence and convention errors.
Students type 3rd and final draft.
The point at which the process coincides.
Rubric is reviewed and questions provided.
Students may know who is peer reviewing their work.
Students fixate on convention errors.
Students submit their work to Turnitin
Teacher provides rapid QMs
Student revises and submits 2nd draft
Student uses the originality report and Grammar Check to revise 3rd draft
Students use PeerMark to review students based on questions that target specific aspects of the rubric.
Students revise and submit final draft.
Rubric is reviewed and understood in order to answer questions.
Engaging tools are available to mark essay.
Progress bar and instant score are available increasing motivation.
Revision can be anonymous and random.
Feedback is legible.
Conventions are addressed prior to PeerMark making it possible for students to focus on content.
Specific, detailed feedback with possible resources provided for a more effective revision process.
No opportunity for a more effective revision process.
Rubric is reviewed and questions provided.