Constructivist Learning Theory

Personal Thoughts

Constructivism is the predominate theory in k-12 education in the region within which I work. Constructivism has its place in the modern classroom but like all things, constructivist learning theory must follow cognitive learning. Cognitive learning lays the foundation necessary for a student to be able to function in a constructivist learning theory educational system. The theories should not be thought of as separate, but a set of successive blocks to be used by educators to build a complete educational experience.

Two Major Branches

Cognitive Constructivism: how the learner understands the world

Social Constuctivism: how meanings and understandings grow

Founding Fathers

Jean Piaget

Vygotsky

Bruner

Active Learning: Student centered initiatives that focus how the student understands the changing world.

Learning-by-doing: The thought that students are inherently inquisitive and should conduct experiments to better understand the world.

Scaffolded Learning: Learning does not take place in a vacuum. Scaffolding activates prior learning and provides context.

Collaboration: Students will often understand the world as they collaborate with others to form a common understanding of an event or process.

Active Learning: Learning and understandings grow when lessons meet students where the student learns so that students participate in their own learning.

Learning-by-doing: Students better understand the world and grow as learners when students act as conductors of experimental processes.

Collaboration: Meaning and understanding are gown through truly collaborative experiences.

Scaffolded Learning: Learning builds upon learning.

Arguments against

Students want to see teachers in the classroom.


Rote learning is lays foundational skills so that students can build a repertoire within the student so that the student can improvise and own his or her learning later in life.

References:

Harasim, L (2017). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Baines, L.A., & Stanley, G. (2001, December). ‘We want to see the teacher’ Constructivism and the rage against expertisePreview the document. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 327-330.

Chrenka, L. (2001, May). Misconstructing constructivismPreview the document. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(9), 694-695.


For this map I wanted to focus on the basic branches of Cognitive Constructivism to lay the foundation for the statement above. I also think the arguments against constructivism are very strong.