Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
New University Governance: How the Academic Profession Perceives the…
Introduction: NPM, network governance, and evaluation.
NPM
Stronger management structures at universities and changes at the level of institutional governance.
-
Network Governance: the emerging interplay of different actors and institutions in network-style and co-opetitive (cooperating and competing). Multilevel governance with a greater range of actors in shared decision-making processes.
Evaluation
NPM. Several features of evaluation are compatible with some propositions of governance based on principles of NPM.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Conclusion
-
Good NPM and bad NPM. The idea of having a unilateral and top down decision making is not well received by university staff. But The performance based and the evaluation based allocation of resources is well received, as long as it influences the decision making processes.
and there is a need and a demand for creative and fl exible social constructions of consequences or implications of evaluation in higher education in support of sustainable knowledge production and institutional learning .
Good NPM would be a performance-based, evaluation - based and quality-based governance of higher education, where governance and evaluation evolve (co-evolve creatively) without the negative side -effects of top-down management bureaucracy.
-
There is no single map for NPM governance in higher education in Europe . This should be regarded as an observation , but also as an argument in favour of the manifold opportunities to develop evaluation creatively
Universities are more linked towards research oriented governance, than to teaching oriented governance.