Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

battery (actus reus (indirect act (R v Martin (1881) (guilty of battery…

- - - - CA - "the lightest touch can be a battery"
  - - - CA - "the lightest touch can be a battery"
  - - - Fagan v MPC
        
        'continuous act theory' - coincidence of actus reus and mens rea
  - - - guilty of battery but didn't touch victims
    - - recklessly committed an indirect act
  - - - D failed to tell V, a police officer, he had needles in pocket resulting in a batter