Perfect and Imperfect Competition

Perfect (Pure) Competition
(Rare)

Imperfect Competition

Characteristics

No price conrol

Conditions of entry/exit are very easy
and without obstacles

Standardized products

Non-price competition - None

Large number of firms

Oligopoly

Monopoly

Monopolistic competition

Characteristics

Characteristics

Characteristics

Differentiated products

No collusion

Firms have limited price control

Some control over price, but within narrow limits

Firms hold small market share

Conditions of entry/exit are relatively easy

Many firms

Non-price competition:
Considerable emphasis on advertising, brand names, trademarks

Sellers have a miniscule part of the market share

No control over firms demand and total product supply

Control over price is limited by mutual interdependence,
considerable with collusion

Conditions to entry/exit are significant

Products are standardized or differentiated

Non-Price competition is typically a great deal
particularly with product differentiation

Few number of firms

Considerable price control

Conditions to entry/exit are blocked

Products are unique with no close substitute

Non-price competition: Mostly public relations
and advertising

One firm

A product for which all other
products in the market are identical

Perfect substitutes for each other

Price Takers

Do not have the ability to price
products on their own

Purely Competitive Demand

Perfectly elastic demand

Firm will produce as much or little as
they wish at the market price

Demand graphs as horizontal line
(at the price)

Revenue Formulae

Total Revenue

Marginal Revenue

Average Revenue

AR = TR / Q = P

TR = P X Q

MR = Change in TR / Change in Quantity

Demand Curve - Highly but not perfectly elastic
(Downward slope)

Long Run

Only a normal profit exists

Firms are still producing where
MR = MC

MR < MC
Produce less output to increase profit / decrease loss

At this point firms
earn a normal profit

Long Run equilibrium is established

Efficiency

Monopolistic competition is inefficient

P > min ATC is condition for productive inefficiency

P > MC is condition for allocative inefficiency

P = MC = Min ATC
Economic efficiency

Excess Capacity

Plant, resources and equipment are often underutilized because
firms are producing below the average total cost output levels

Firm Concentration

Four Firm Concentration ratio

Output of 4 largest firms /
Total output of industry

Herfindahl Index

Sum of squared % market share
of all firms in the industry

Limited - National in scope

Profit Maximisation
and
Loss Minimising

Total Revenue - Total Cost Approach

3 Questions

Marginal Revenue - Marginal Cost Approach

Loss minimising case

Has it been determined that the
firm should produce in the short run?

Is it necessary to calculate profit/loss
for the firm?

Should the firm produce at
all in the short run?

The competitive producer will wish
to produce at the output level where TR
exceeds TC by the greatest amount

Break even point

Output at which the firm makes a 0 profit

TR = TC

Calculations

TR = TC x Q

Prof/Loss = TR - TC

TC = TFC + TVC

Makes use of MR = MC rule

Price taker

P = MR = MC

3 Questions

What amount should be produced?

What economic prof/loss will be realised?

Should the firm produce?

Calculations

ATC = TC / Q

Prof/Loss = MR - ATC

MC = Change in TC / Change in Q

AVC = TVC / Q

AFC = TFC / Q

Firm should produce or shut down in short run

Losses at minimum where MR = MC

Producing adds more to revenue than to cost

Still produces because MR > Min AVC

Shutdown Case

Short run shutdown point

P < Min AVC
(Intersection of AVC and MC)

Short Run Supply

Shut Down

Produce

P is below AVC

P is = or above AVC

Break Even Point

MC intersects ATC