Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Philosophy of Science (Social Epistemology of Science (Social Norms…
Philosophy of Science
-
Explanation
-
-
-
-
-
Deductive nomological
Temporality problem - deductive arguments are time-symmetric so it has the weird result of letting the future explain the present
Causality problem - DN doesn't require causal connections which means it's vulnerable to flag pole examples
Laws problem - we seem to be able to offer some explanations without relying on any laws at all, esp for very local, context specific phenomena
Relevance problem - we can add irrelevant premises or details to our arguments and they are still explanatory on DN
-
-
-
Causation
Counterfactuals
Manipulability
-
Dilemma: either it only applies to physically possible interventions and its limited or it applies hypothetical counterfactuals and we are back to Lewis-Stalnaker
-
-
-
-
-
Confirmation theory
Bayesianism
-
What constrains C(e, h)?
Probability coordination principle (PCP) - our credence should match the probability our hypothesis assigns to it
Radical personalism - nothing. C(e, h) is our subjective credence
-
-
-
-
Irrelevant conjuncts
If the conjunct is probabilistically independent of h, e, and h&e, then any e which confirms h does not confirm the conjunct
-
-
-
Old Evidence Problem
Rerunning history - imagine you had h first and then calculate a base rate for c(e) before you learned e.
Confirmation Holism
When h&a are falsified by e, the less probable conjunct diminishes more in probability, assuming C(h, e) = C(h, ~ha) and C(a, h) =/= c(a)
-
-
-
Causal Inference
Process tracing
Regress problem - how do you distinguish a causal process from a non-causal one without counterfactuals or regress
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-