Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Risk (Product landscape (methodology (engagement approach, tactical…
Risk
Product landscape
BLIND SPOT
have no F* idea
enterprise specificiity
segment?
benefits?
methodology
engagement approach
tactical revenue v. strategic value
little rigour
(security environments)
business understanding
ownership and tech 'wieght'
pricing not considered
IP understanding and management
multi-national members
including key chinese
uncontrolled acedemic activities
publications in ac papers
'mixed' IP
3rd party IP clash
licensing
possible taint
[OSS]
GPLv2
exec+split/combine
BLIND SPOT
US provisional patents in progress
geographic distribution
singapore
london (not italy)
all dev in different homes
BLIND SPOT
lack of network
not willing to have cnversations?
location?
governance
(stabiity of mission)
power/control dynamics
Gumi starting to overstep
engineering dominating?
lack of governance
(SMT working together)
(cross-discpline interest)
operations of service - no real progress
compliance GAP
privacy
export
organisation
operational engineering
research mindset
quality
J + M good
but quite intexperienced and earnest
CTP very detail-oriented - will not scale
people and fit
insecurity
capabilities
GAPS
technical single point of failure(s)
functional holes
C
maturity*
no not understand
little insight
no not know
BLIND SPOTS
have no F* idea
low self-confidence
(do not say/argue)
channel
(apple app store)
little understanding
sale processes
reputation
protocol quality
[implementation quality]
thought leadership
[software]
secure coding style?
use of SQL lite?
1-2 contributor
performance - no progress
biometric quality
level of qualification
face only
diversity
response
complex m-of-n v. network
100-150, 300-400ms
network dependency
partnering
poor understanding
poor differentiation