CON LAW
Standing
Ripeness
Abstention
1st AMENDMENT
FED vs. STATE
STATE ACTION
(1) the plaintiff has suffered a concrete injury; (2) that injury is caused by the actions of the defendant; and (3) it must be likely that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision
Mootness
Commerce Clause
10th Amendment
11th Amendment
the fed gov cannot reg the states as states, but they can adopt gen regs that apply to states and private entities equally (ex. min. wage laws)
fed courts gen may not hear damages actions against states and their agencies (EXCEPTIONS:injunctions and money damages not from the treasury)
CC gives the fed gov the power to:
regulate the channels of interstate com;
regulate the instrumentalities of that com;
and reg activities that have a substantial ECONOMIC
effect on that com
Dormant CC
limitations on states power to reg interstate com
state cannot favor in-state interests over out
if nondiscrim, but incidentally burdens interstate com, = BALANCING TEST: the action is invalid if the burden on interstate com outweighs the benefit to the state
Equal Protection
Takings
Due process
Procedural DP
Substantive DP
a person's interest in a gov is protected only if the person has a LEGIT claim of entitlement to the benefit. no mere expectancy
protects against unreasonable laws or other gov action: if FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT: law must pass strict scrutiny; i.e., necessary and compelling
14th A
equal protection under the laws
5th A prohibits gov from taking private prop for public use w/o just compensation
suspect class/fundamental rights: STRICT SCRUTINY and NECESSARY AND COMPELLING
gender/legitimacy = INTERMEDIATE scrutiny;
SUBSTANTIALLY AND IMPORTANT
ALL OTHERS: Rational basis, and the challenger must prove, NOT the gov
GENERALLY: necessary and compelling for content restrictions
unprotected speech
restraint not allowed if: over-breadth/vagueness
time place and manner restriction
right to associate
right not to speak
freedom of religion
prior restraint
any gov action that prevents a communication from reaching the public
whatever you want? YES Whenever and wherever? NO
speech can be regulated in public forums by: CONTENT NEUTRAL regs, NARROWLY TAILORED to serve a SIGNIFICANT gov interest; and that leaves open alt channels of communication
imminent lawless action, true threats, defamation
free exercise clause
establishment clause
protects any belief, NOT all conduct
prevents the gov from playing favorites; gov cannot prefer one religious sect over another.
valid only if: it has a secular purpose; and has a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion; and does not produce excessive gov entanglement w/ religion (LEMON TEST)