CON LAW

Standing

Ripeness

Abstention

1st AMENDMENT

FED vs. STATE

STATE ACTION

(1) the plaintiff has suffered a concrete injury; (2) that injury is caused by the actions of the defendant; and (3) it must be likely that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision

Mootness

Commerce Clause

10th Amendment

11th Amendment

the fed gov cannot reg the states as states, but they can adopt gen regs that apply to states and private entities equally (ex. min. wage laws)

fed courts gen may not hear damages actions against states and their agencies (EXCEPTIONS:injunctions and money damages not from the treasury)

CC gives the fed gov the power to:
regulate the channels of interstate com;
regulate the instrumentalities of that com;
and reg activities that have a substantial ECONOMIC
effect on that com

Dormant CC

limitations on states power to reg interstate com

state cannot favor in-state interests over out

if nondiscrim, but incidentally burdens interstate com, = BALANCING TEST: the action is invalid if the burden on interstate com outweighs the benefit to the state

Equal Protection

Takings

Due process

Procedural DP

Substantive DP

a person's interest in a gov is protected only if the person has a LEGIT claim of entitlement to the benefit. no mere expectancy

protects against unreasonable laws or other gov action: if FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT: law must pass strict scrutiny; i.e., necessary and compelling

14th A

equal protection under the laws

5th A prohibits gov from taking private prop for public use w/o just compensation

suspect class/fundamental rights: STRICT SCRUTINY and NECESSARY AND COMPELLING

gender/legitimacy = INTERMEDIATE scrutiny;
SUBSTANTIALLY AND IMPORTANT

ALL OTHERS: Rational basis, and the challenger must prove, NOT the gov

GENERALLY: necessary and compelling for content restrictions

unprotected speech

restraint not allowed if: over-breadth/vagueness

time place and manner restriction

right to associate

right not to speak

freedom of religion

prior restraint

any gov action that prevents a communication from reaching the public

whatever you want? YES Whenever and wherever? NO

speech can be regulated in public forums by: CONTENT NEUTRAL regs, NARROWLY TAILORED to serve a SIGNIFICANT gov interest; and that leaves open alt channels of communication

imminent lawless action, true threats, defamation

free exercise clause

establishment clause

protects any belief, NOT all conduct

prevents the gov from playing favorites; gov cannot prefer one religious sect over another.

valid only if: it has a secular purpose; and has a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion; and does not produce excessive gov entanglement w/ religion (LEMON TEST)