Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Negligence (Elements of Negligence (Breach of Duty (Occurs when one has…

- - - - the American Club needed to ensure a high standard of care, when it comes to the construction & renovation of the amenities to ensure the safety of club members
        
        However, the American Club exercised a low standard of care
        
        In the article, it is evident that the American Club had failed to ensure that the glass door complied with industry standards, as a reasonable amount of force had to be applied on the glass door to be able to shut it
  - - - Due to the lack of detailed checks on the glass door, the teenager received cuts and PTSD from the shattering of glass which of in the vicinity of the country club.
  - - - The club owes a duty of care ensuring the safety of all the members, including the teenage girl.
        
        The club should have tested the glass door before opening it to public
        
        the American Club should be held liable for the injuries
- - - - Not applicable
        
        The plaintiff was not committing any criminal offences
  - - - Applicable
        
        The American Club has claimed that the girl may have contributed to her injuries in failing to use the glass door in the shower area reasonably. American Club may choose to use this defence in court, but will still be held partly responsible for the injuries of the teenage girl.
  - - - Not applicable
        
        The plaintiff did not voluntarily participate in any specifically risky activities
- - - - Hospital bills
      - Reconstructive surgery