Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
evaluation of watson and rayner (ethical and social implications (le…
evaluation of watson and rayner
ethical and social implications
Health sector
can unlearn phobias
systematic desensitisation which counter conditions
valuable and positive for treatment of phobias
psychological harm
vulnerable ptt
caused distress and could have long lasting fear response
prevented him from sucking his thumb
w&r would defend their ethics
no more than rough and tumble
albert was removed before he could be decnditioned
ethical guidlines did not exist
le francois
maximize pleasant stimuli
environment
associate school with positive experences, lead to better attendance
individual benefits
didn't deal with ethical issues
no debrief
didn't return albert to no fear
findings and conclusions
Freud psychodynamic theory
projection of unconscious conflicts
Little Hans
Martin Seligman
humans are genetically programmed to quickly learn for fear purposes
phobias are innate rather than learnt
methodology and procedures
increased external reliabiity
replicable
controlled observation with standardised procedures
filming means it can be repeated
low population validity
only one male
findngs unique to ittle albert
can't be generalised
lacks ecological validity
control makes it artificial
difficult to generalise
internally valid
controlled observation
legitimate measure