Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
q. 9 - Quality criteria in qual. res.; Evaluation criteria compatible w…
q. 9 - Quality criteria in qual. res.;
Evaluation criteria compatible w ep. framework
Quality Criteria
Henwood & Pidgeon
(1992)
Importance of FIT
Analytic categories should Fit the Data
Integration of Theory
Relationship btw diff. Units of Analysis
should be Explained
REFLEXIVITY
acknowledging the Role of the Researcher
Documentation
complete account of:
What was done
Why it was done
**Theoretical sampling &
negative case analysis**
test Theory both on cases
that should Fit
and that Should Not Fit
Sensitivity to Negotiated Realities
attend to the Reaction of Participant
to the Research Results
Transferability
can it be Applied to other Contexts?
Report Contextual features of the Study
Soc. Const. version of
Grounded Theory
-Inspired
Elliott et al.
(1999)
Owning one's perspective
Researcher disclose Values and Assumptions
--> other can better Interpret d Analysis
ca. Reflexivity
Situating the Sample
Describe Participants and their Life Circumstances
--> to assess Relevance and Applicability
ca. Transferability
Grounding in Examples
researchers Use Examples from Data to show how things have been Analyzed and how they produced some Understanding
--> reader can assess the Fit btw data and Res.er's Interpretations
ca. Importance of Fit
Providing Credibility Checks
show Credibility of Interpretations:
refer to Other's Interpretations
Applying other Analysis Methods
ca. Sensitivity to negotiated realities
Coherence
Analyses presented, characterized by
Coherence and Integration
ca. Integration of theory
Accomplishing General vs.
Specific research tasks
Res.ers need be clear bt res. Tasks:
General Understaning: appropriate Range of data
Insight in a specific case: need be studied Systematically and Exhaustively
Resonating with readers
Style of findings: reader feels it Clarifies or Expands Understanding
Phenomenological
methods Inspired
What does it mean that eval. criteria need be Compatible w the Ep. Framework?
Type of Findings vary
accordingly to
Ep. Framework
(3 qq.s) &
Eval. Criteria
need to
Change accordingly
Realist
(Realist GT)
in terms of
Objectivity and Reliability
to which extent they
Captured what is Really going on
Contextual Const.
(Phen. m.s, Narrative, Soc. Const. GT)
extent they
Grounded observations/interpr.s within the Context
that produced them
Reflexivity concern
: acknowledge and show how Res.er has Influenced
Radical Const.
(DIscursive Psych., FDA)
tell a
Good, Internally Coherent, Differentiated, Compelling/Persuasive story
?