Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Blondes to Die Out in 200 Years (Ethical Issues (BBC News' Health…
Blondes to Die Out in
200 Years
Ethical Issues
BBC News' Health section published this article with zero evidence of research
In every article, there should be a link if you are referring to a research, study, or another article. They fail to link the audience to the study that is mentioned.
There's no visual evidence that supports the argument
The only reliable source is Jonathan Rees, professor of dermatology at the University of Edinburgh
Published September 27, 2002
Published on BBC News
Reaction
There's no solid evidence that make the audience
believe what's written in the article
It's hard to believe an article like this was written
This article made me wonder if it's worth trying to find the original study that it is mentioned
Seeing as the BBC News published this, I thought it would have been more scholarly
What could change
I think that if the article had actual evidence from the study, it would had felt more honest
If they wanted to make this believable, the publication and reporter could have written about something more important than the color of hair
Overall, if there was actual evidence this could have been an article worth reading
Opinion
A different headline instead of click baiting the public by making them worry
The writer calls out unnatural blondes and blames them for the "decline" which seems wrong
In an article, one the most important things are having reliable sources and that is something that was lacking
After reading it, I felt disappointed at the BBC for publishing this
Opposing View
"Bottle blondes" are being blame with no evidence of so-called research
The writer fails to mention blonde men which makes it seem only women are "dying out."
There's only one credited source and in article's it is essential to have 2 or more sources
Published