Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
McGuinn (Politics and the Future of the Federal Role in Education (Despite…
McGuinn
-
The Origins of NCLB
“Journalistic coverage of NCLB, for example, has generally implied that support for the law at the national level is tentative and emphasized the growing opposition to its mandates at the state level.” (McGuinn, 2005, 44)
“Some scholars have argued that NCLB does not represent a major shift in federal education policy but rather is simply an extension of the 1994 reforms contained in Goals of 2000 and Improving America’s Schools Act.” (McGuinn, 2005, 44)
“Comparing NCLB with the most recent prior reauthorization of ESEA in 1994 shows the NCLB does not take federal education policy in a new direction.” (McGuinn, 2005, 45)
“Paul Manna has emphasized its derivation from earlier state education reform efforts.” (McGuinn, 2005, 45)
“He has advanced what he calls a “ agenda setting” model to explain the passage of NCLB and argues that state activity on education reform put pressure on the federal government to embrace standards, accountability, and choice.” (McGuinn, 2005, 45)
“As a result, by the spring of 2002, shortly after the passage of NCLB, only sixteen states had fully met the requirements of the 1994 law.” (McGuinn, 2005, 45)
-
-
-
-
“The passage of the No Child Left Behind Act signaled the beginning of a new era of federal education policy and a significantly transformed and expanded national role in our country’s schools.”(McGuinn 66)