Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Stealing (Utilitarianism (BUT (This could indirectly be greater…

- - - - You can't steal if someone does not own it
      - Cannot justify stealing by forbidding private property
- - - - Concept of ownership disappears
      - Contradiction in conception
        
        Stealing is wrong
  - - - Would not lead to the end of property
      - Rare circumstance
      - Unlikely that Kant would agree
        
        'To steal' causes a contradiction in conception
        
        Irrelevant purpose
        
        Contradiction in will to not help others
        
        Duties of justice are more stringent than duties of virtue
- - - - Unjust state of affairs through no one's actions
        
        To do an unjust act is worse
      - Unjust state of affairs by someone's actions
        
        Demands justice in rectification
    - - Disagree that stealing is an act that is never in the mean
      - Stealing can be justified if it foes not involve depriving someone
      - Require practical wisdom