Geography - Resource management

Food

Energy (mix)

Water

Demands change + why

Global inequalities / patterns + reasons

Importing Food

Why does the UK import so much food

Pros of Importing Food

Cons of Importing Food

It may be cheaper than self-producing

There is not enough arable (able to be plowed) land to be entirely self-sufficient

Some produce cannot be grown here because of our climate

It increases food prices because the food is travelling longer distances

We get wider variety of foods

We can eat seasonal foods all year round - diet isn't decided by seasons

Offers more land for us to use for other purposes (e.g housing, hospitals) instead of using on farms

Imported foods often have chemicals added to them which makes the food possibly dangerous

High CO2 emissions by transporting food to UK (19m tonnes overall)

Agribusiness

Local farmers will not be able to compete with the international market and may stop producing food harming UK food security

Our diet isn't governed by the seasons

Highly intensive / large scale commercial farming

Increases carbon footprint / food miles

How it works

Remove hedgerows

Modern production methods

Latest tech

Combine smaller farms / Increase field size

Higher level of mechanisation

Better feeds

Increased use of chemicals

Water

Food

Energy

Consumption

Consumption

Consumption

The UK relies primarily on fossil fuels

Ease of harness

Reliability

1990

2013

Coal : 70 %

Nuclear : 20%

Oil : 7%

Gas : 35%

Oil : 32%

Coal : 19%

Gas usage increased now than before (0.5 - 35%)

Produces 50% less CO2 than coal

Coal has become harder / more expensive to extract

Nuclear usage decreased now than before (20% - 7%)

Public fear of catastrophe

Expensive upfront costs (60% compared to coal which is 10%)

Significance to economic and social well being

Water insecurity leads to

Food insecurity leads to

Energy insecurity leads to

Waterborne disease and water pollution

Food production hindered

Industrial output hindered

Famine

Undernutrition

Soil erosion

Rising prices

Exploration of environmentally sensitive areas

Economic and environmental costs

Food production hindered

Industrial output hindered

Potential conflict for all 3

Average UK Person : 150L / day
Average African Person : 47L / day

Overall increasing

70% increase since 1985

Increase in wealth

Wider usage of domestic appliances

Out of season food

Additional watering needed in greenhouses

Increase in population

Exotic foods

Shift to organics

Opportunities

Challenges

Opportunities

Challenges

High profit

Foreign farmers get more money

Retail value up to 5x more in UK than locally

Taxes can help fund development in LICs

Compromise of food security

Pollution

Carbon footprint increase

Food miles increase

Import tax - tariffs

High profit

People live healthier

More expensive then conventional

No conventional pesticides can be used

Cost pushed onto customer

Low yields due to lower farming intensity

Overall increase

More domestic appliances

Increase in industry

Increase in transport infrastructure

Trains

Cars

Renewable energy scheme in a LIC : Chambamontera CASE STUDY
Micro - hydro scheme

Transfer schemes are necessary

There are inequalities in supply and demand - areas of deficit and surplus

Kielder Transfer Scheme

Fracking issues

Is nuclear a viable alternative?

Total cost of $51,000

Average cost of $750 per family

Benefits

Social

Economic

Environmental

Reduction in rural-urban migration / brain drain

Healthcare improved as medicines can be stored cold

Business development

Water harnessed to generate HEP

Allows flow to be regulated

Bypass channels water away from river, generates electricity, then returning water to river

Water from pipes can be used for coffee dehusking and processing

Scheme will last minimum 25 years

Reduced danger of flooding as flow can be regulated

Reduced deforestation as alternative source of energy

Advantages

Disadvantages

Very large amount of energy created

Exposes to less radiation than coal power plants

No CO2 emission

Operating costs are lower

Expensive upfront costs compared to coal (60% compared to 10%)

Waste is difficult to deal with

Reactor meltdowns

Economic

Environmental

Leakage of chemicals into drinking water

Release of greenhouse gas methane

Increased production and lingering of smog

Undercuts the long-term economic prospects of an area

Less prepared for future growth if reliant on fossil fuel extraction for economy

Drives high demand for water transportation infrastructure

The traffic created damages local roads as much as 3.5 million car trips