Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Lecture 13a: Peer Relationships (Development (Developmental trends…
Lecture 13a: Peer Relationships
Development
Developmental trends
Preschool years (2-5yrs)
increase in complex, reciprocal peer interaction
over time, decrease in solitary play, parallel play, increase in associative and cooperative play
Elementary school years
Form peer groups with informal structure & organisation (leaders within group)
interact with peer group on regular basis
more cooperative, complex play where games have formal rules
Infancy-toddler years (0-2yrs)
6-12mth: interest in peers emerge early on
18-24mth: coordinated interactions with peers
Increasing social interaction with age
Adolescence
Cliques
characteristics
Provide sense of identity & belonging
Small group of friends with more formal structure
more peer pressure
Members of clique similar in
Levels of "popularity"
Attractiveness
Levels of aggression/shyness
Prosocial behaviour
Academic aspirations
Changes in clique behaviour with age
Unstable cliques-->Stable cliques
Conformity-->Autonomy (where they have own sense of identity)
Same-sex-->Mixed cliques
Single clique-->belong to multiple cliques
Functions
Sense of belonging, self-worth
Part of establishing identity
Have ppl to spend time with
BUT may encourage deviant behaviour
Crowds
large reference group with similar stereotypes
Sharp increase in time spent with peers
how peer groups help development
Children more likely to
Challenge ideas & commands
Try out new behaviours
Express emotions & opinions
Helps to develop
Inhibitory control
Perspective-taking skills
Understanding of display roles
Cooperation
Emotion regulation/expression
there's power diff between parent & child but peers are on equal footing
Peer Acceptance
Sociometric status (what your peers think of you)
Sociometric categories
Neglected
"withdrawn", has interests other than peers
Few positive, few negative
Controversial
Many positive, many negative
Prosocial but also disruptive & aggressive (eg. Bully+class clown)
Rejected
Aggressive, disruptive, bossy, uncooperative
Anxious, withdrawn
Few positive, many negative
Popular
Friendly, cooperative, prosocial
Not aggressive or withdrawn
Many positive, few negative
How to measure
Nominations technique
positive: eg"who do u like the most"
Negative: eg"who do u like the least"
Rating-scale technique
Rate every child on a "likeability" scale
Popularity
Cultural diff
Prosocial kids typically liked, aggressive kids disliked
China vs US: china is ok to be shy & withdrawn but not in US
Stability over time
Overt aggression less likely to result in rejection among older children
Withdrawal behaviours more strongly associated with rejection as kids get older
Children often change sociometric groups (eg. become popular) EXCEPT rejected aggressive kids
Perceived popularity leads to more aggression over time
Why
Athletic ability (esp for boys)
temperament (poor emotion regulation-->peer rejection)
physical attractiveness
Social skills (strong predictor of peer relations where poor social skills-->peer rejection)
Consequences of peer difficulties
higher risk of
depression, low self-esteem
antisocial behaviour later in life
truancy, dropping out of school
more lonely, depressed/anxious
Friendships
Conceptions
2-4 yrs
more likely to pretend and cooperate with friends
Increase in cooperative play at this age
Friend= person you spend the most time with
Early school years
Friends are nice to you
Friends are ppl who are easier to spend time with
Friends are ppl who share your interests, want to play with same toys
Under 2 yrs
Prefer physical proximity of particular children, smile more at them
Play side by side
Adolescence
Friends are ppl who are loyal, keep your secrets
Friends listen to your problems, make you feel better
Appearance of psychological terms like "trust"
Expectations of reciprocity
Purpose
emotional support & validation
Provide help & guidance
Buffer against stress
Companionship
Disadv: children with aggressive friends tend to exhibit more aggressive behaviours
may encourage deviant behaviour
Long term: 5th graders with close reciprocated friendships do better in college & have higher quality family & social life