Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Collaborative learning: Theoretical foundations and applicable strategies…
Collaborative learning: Theoretical foundations and
applicable strategies to university
Strategies for Promoting Dialogue, Listening to Others and Reciprocal Evaluation.
Chain Brainstorming or exchanging of ideas
Objective: Promotion of expressiveness, spontaneous communication and participation.
Description:
Groups of eight subjects.
The teacher proposes a subject, of empirical significance, in relation to the issue.
Every subject, in a round, writes a short phrase and write it sequentially in a group board
The round is reiterated three times.
Each group board is collectively compared.
Mediated opinion transmission
Objective: Faithfull listening transmission.
Description:
Groups of four subjects
Fact or problem given by the teacher, in each tetrad, S1 gives an opinion to S2, and S2 does the same with S1. At the same time, S3 gives an opinion to S4, and S4 does the same with S3.
Then, third-party messages are re-circulated among S1 and S3, and S2 and S4, and among S1 and S2, and S3 and S4.
Finally, each subject writes an opinion from others based on what was transmitted.
Joint assessment in each tetrad and group-class assessment.
Reciprocal peer assessment.
Objective: Stimulation of other’s assessment
Description:
In pairs
Each subject corrects and assesses written answer(s) (of an exercise) of their alter, at his/her discretion.
Based on the correct model shown by the teacher, each one is corrected by a member of another couple or both.
Assessing commission.
Objective: Promote collective assessment criteria and inter-subjective control stimulation
Description:
Groups of four subjects.
Each group subject production is assessed by a peer committees
(members of another group), who issue a written opinion.
Four subjects under evaluation compare and discuss their opinions.
Each subject counter-argues or responds to the evaluation received
The teacher sets out their expert criterion in general, solving particular conflicts.
Participation symmetry.
Mandatory alternation of participation.
Objective: Participation equity maintenance
Description:
Groups of four subjects.
The group performance participation is regulated so that eachsubject, following a mandatory sequence, must make a contribution or solve an item.
Inputs are registered in a group board.
Technique may be completed with the assessment of each input, in a mandatory sequential order.
Participation quota
Objective: Equitable participation dosing.
Description:
Groups of four subjects
Each subject has a certain participation quota, that may be freely administered, but at the end of the task, it should have been used.
If, during task development a subject failed to use the whole quote they shall have a mandatory credit for the next task.