Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Consent (Sexual pleasure (R v Brown: gay BDSM, not in public interest for…
Consent
Sexual pleasure
R v Brown: gay BDSM, not in public interest for people to harm each other
R v Dica: HIV, you can consent to the risk of harm
R v Meachen: broom in anus, didn't see risk of harm, so acquitted
R v Slingsby: vaginal fisting, ring, did not intend or foresee level of harm
R v Emmett: bag over head, set breasts on fire, intended to cause harm so couldn't use consent
Horseplay
R v Jones: boys at nightclub, horseplay was defence.
R v Aitken: drunk RAF fire, consent allowed.
-
-
Sports/games
R v Barnes: in heat of moment, force might occur, especially in competitive games.
-
Tattoos
R v Wilson: branded wife bum, no different to tattoo.
R v BM: removal of ear + nipple too extreme, not equivalent to tattoo
Correction of child
-
R v H: will depend on duration, force, consequences etc.
-