Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Unpleasant design (Design against specific classes, certain minority…
Unpleasant design
Design against specific classes, certain minority groups and their behavior
Selection of people who can stay in public places, essentially certain groups are designed out of public places due to the introduction of design that works against a target audience
-
-
Gordan Savivic and Selena Savic case of study regard pigeons .(referred to human “unwanted” classes )
-
New way to design object, goes beyond simple functionality or appearance
Urbanization and modernism (gentrification of neighborhoods), Unpleasant Design also shows the advancement of design
-
Investments from cities to create Unpleasant Design objects, authorities seem unable to watch and simply let people live and use a public space that was created for nothing but their benefit, does their wish to control go too far? Should awareness of this circumstance be raised among the public?
Waste of city funds, should be used for substantial needs of public
In a period of crisis, city funds waste can be seen as excuse from the country to steal public money. There is a purpose behind it that probably does not want to be admitted publicly, how would an entire city react if they were informed directly that authorities intend to manipulate them? (Still only some groups are targeted)
Scandals and accusations from mass media, conflicts can arise
-
Cities automatically create social classes, the individual social classes are affected by their surroundings differently, some might be more "vulnerable" to unpleasant design than others due to social standing
J.R.R. Tolkien critique to industrialization and cities which only divide people and pollute the nature, connection to Unpleasant design, how do modern concepts resemble those of the past?
-
Creation of a privileged high class, shows presence of social elite in broader social context
