Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive
breeding and…
Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive
breeding and restoration programmes (Leberg and Firmin 2008)
Intro 1
Genetic load
Reducing the frequency of deleterious recessive alleles by process of purging lead to reduction of genetic load
Important term
Fitness is defined as the relative ability of different genotype to contribute individual to the next generation.
inbreeding depression typically refers to the
reduced fitness of offspring of related individuals relative to the fitness of offspring of randomly mated individuals.
-
genetic load, which can be defined as the relative difference between the average fitness of a population’s
members and the fitness of the most fit genotype
Inbreeding depression
dominance or partial dominance when fitness in offspring of relative decreasing will result in increasing of homozygosity of deleterious recessive alleles
-
Intro 2
-
Environment and purging
Environmental factors that decrease the relative fitness of homozygotes of deleterious alleles makes purging more efficient.
Inbreeding depression is more severe in stressful environment compared to non-stressful. Hence, purging is more successful under stressful or competitive conditions.
In conservation, purging is effective in an environment which purging occurred. Fixed alleles during purging might deleterious in other environment. Therefore, purging in small captive population might diminish individual viability when release in a restoration program.
-
-
Results and Discussion
-
-
Success for founders experienced multiple bottleneck (more fixation of deleterious which increased susceptibility to extinction) is smaller than that of no past history/single bottleneck.
Effects of past bottlenecks are greater than effects of founder relatedness on population growth and extinction.
Effects of inbreeding (inbreeding depression) are not reduced in population experienced multiple bottlenecks (purging did not fully eliminate deleterious alleles)
Methods
-
:star:6 populations of control treatment (no bottleneck treatment): 2 mesocosms/ each population
:star:6 population of bottleneck treatment (single bottleneck treatment): 2 mesocosms/ each population
:star: 2 successful populations from serial bottleneck treatment ( 4 bottleneck treatments): 12 mesocosms/ each population (half founed by siblings)Null hypothesis: There is no differences in population growth among bottleneck history treatment based on relatedness of founding individuals
Alternative hypothesis: There is differences in population growth among bottleneck history treatment based on relatedness of founding individuals
- Differences in population growth were assessed by measuring the population size of 2 generations.
- If the null hypothesis is rejected, indicate that purging had an effect on inbreeding depression.
Mesocosm : Outdoor experimental system that examines natural environment under controlled conditions