The Self

Do we know about ourselves

By knowing who are we, we looking into these two component

Self concept – Set of beliefs about our qualities

Self esteem –Self-esteem is an individual’s positive or negative evaluation of himself or herself. (E.E. Jones, 1990)

how do we construct a self concept?

Very similar processes as when we build impressions of others (integration of cues)

Possible sources of knowledge about ourselves are

Imagining behavior

Thoughts and feelings

Other people’s reactions

Social comparison

Own behavior

We are what we do (Self perception theory, Bem, 1967) {We make inferences based on what we do (especially true when self is forming, and for ambiguous situations)}

We make inferences we behaviors are freely chosen (Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1971) l Do it for ourselves vs. other ends

Thinking about a behavior increases the accessibility of certain traits

How we feel tells us more about ourselves than our behavior – What you feel deep inside is more indicative of who you are

Charles H. Cooley (1902): The lookingglass self contains other people’s reactions to us.

1)Comparing to others (similar others) shape how we see ourselves 2) Comparisons must be meaningful to give an accurate representation 3) Avoid extreme comparisons. They can lead to contrast effect (e.g., you compare yourself with a top athlete and you think you are very bad) 4) Comparisons can be biased – Even if you compare yourself to someone slightly better than you, you will move a bit toward that direction = assimilation effect

Miller, Brickman, & Bolen (1975): l Labeling kids as tidy actually makes them act in a tidy way. (Self-fulfilling prophecy!) l For adults, self views do not depend as much on other people’s opinions, ... l ... but on their beliefs about other people’s opinions and their perception of other people’s reactions

can be

1) Upward vs. downward social comparisons 2) Can be context-dependent (winning vs. not losing) 3) Can serve our need to feel good about ourselves

  1. There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his (or her) opinions and his (or her) abilities. 2. To the extent that objective, non-social means are not available, people evaluate their opinions and abilities by comparison respectively with the opinions and abilities of others. 3. The tendency to compare oneself with some other specific person decreases as the difference between his (or her) opinion or ability and one’s own increases. 4. There is a unidirectional drive upward in the case of abilities, which is largely absent in opinions. 5. There are non-social restraints, which make it difficult or even impossible to change one’s ability. These non-social restraints are largely absent for opinions.

How do we achieve coherence?

How do we put all the pieces together to form an overall representation?

Self-Schema (Markus, 1977) is a way

A self-schema consists of some core traits or attributes that people believe characterize them across situations and set them apart from other people.

Once activated, people seek (and see) evidence for these traits in every interaction (e.g., I think I am helpful, I see my benevolence in each interaction = Confirmation)

Once We Have a Self-Concept

Accessibility of a subset of traits is another

Coherence can be achieved by making accessible a certain subset of traits.

For instance, asking people to think of their good behaviors can increase their likelihood of seeing themselves as more moral

Selective Memory (always accurate?) is another way


People have selective memory, so that they forget inconsistent information about the self and easily retrieve consistent information. If some information needs to be reconstructed to be consistent, people will do this very easily.

are

Knowledge about self stored in longterm memory

are

Evaluation of knowledge about self

How to Construct Positive Self-Esteem?

1) Our goal: Feel good about ourselves! 2) Self-enhancing bias: l Any tendency to gather or interpret information concerning the self in a way that leads to overly positive evaluations (p. 109). 3) Try to accumulate more positive than negative experiences (and remember the positive > negative) 4) Adjust our contribution based on the outcomes (if the group presentation was great, I did a lot! Vs. if it is bad, I did little) 5) Social comparisons: Upward vs. downward comparison

It is hard for us to change the way we see ourselves

We use what defines us the most to judge and understand others (e.g., I value morality -> I look for morality in others)

Shape our emotions

Regulates our behavior!!

related to

Self presentation

The Self and Emotions

Self expression

We act based on what we think we are

Depends on self monitoring( how we make other sees us ideally)

+and – emotions tell us that something + or – about the self has happened.

We appraise what happens to the self following a certain event.

We give a meaning to our bodily reactions

Different appraisals can create different emotions

Appraisal (= how we interpret)

Emotions and affective states can be interpreted differently Sometimes, we are not aware of how emotions shape our behavior

Self-Discrepancy Theory (Higgins, 1987, 1989)

means

Discrepancies between various standards and actual aspects of the self.

  1. Actual self (How one is) wishes and hopes)
  1. Ideal self (How one would like to be
  1. Ought self (How one should be; duties, social and moral norms)

we act based on two motivation

  1. Promotion Focus
  1. Prevention Focus

achieving positive outcomes (Ideal self)

avoiding negative outcomes (Should self)

-Succeed -> Happiness

  • Fail -> Sadness
  • Succeed -> Relief
  • Fail -> Anxiety

Threat to one self

May cause long lasting and chronic damages

Esp. dangerous for populations at risk (some people suffer heart disease)

Stress & change in hormone levels

Negative intense emotions

how do we fight this

we can fight it by

Distraction – After negative feedback, people watch more TV, avoid interactions, avoid self awareness (e.g., stay away from mirrors)

Emotions-focused coping: 1) Emotional intelligence l 2)Emotion regulation

Reaffirming our values – Terror Management Theory (Solomon et al., 1997). Focus on cultural values

Coping with negative emotions

Emotion Regulation Strategies (Gross, 2003)

Cognitive Reappraisal(self reflect and become better next time)

Cognitive Suppression (to intake and push down the negative emotion)

Self handicapping

“Learned Helplessness” = Belief that we cannot change the course of events and failure is inevitable.

maintain a positive self by

self reappraisal

self enhancement

attack the problem