Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

the characters of successful entrepreneur (team work (The impact of…

- - - - DOES SELF-OTHER AGREEMENT ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS MODERATE THE VALIDITY OF LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS
        10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00848.x
        
        . Leaders were classified into over-estimation, under-estimation, or agreement categories, based on the difference between their self-ratings of leadership and the ratings provided by superiors and/or subordinates.
        
        Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.007
        
        Data is collected from 194 students in 41 groups. Analysis is performed with hierarchical linear modeling. The results suggest that SRL is positively related to assessments at the individual level. Team learning and psychological safety are positively related to assessments at the group level.
        
        Entrepreneurship and leadership: common trends and common thread
        https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00019-6
        
        The continued treatment of entrepreneurship as a separate area of study that is distinct from other broader domains (e.g., leadership and interpersonal influence) is questioned.
        
        The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons to be learned
        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.004
        
        Similar to the path that leadership scholars have taken, those who study entrepreneurship also struggle with issues associated with a field in its early stages. This review examines the intersection between the fields of leadership and entrepreneurship with an emphasis on how the path taken by leadership research can inform entrepreneurship and possibly lessen this young field's growing pains. We first identify several areas where these fields theoretically converge (both in the models employed and the research questions addressed). Next, we take a historical perspective of leadership and entrepreneurship by identifying the life cycle stage of each construct or domain. Finally, we conclude with some thoughts on how the entrepreneurship field may avoid (or is avoiding) the pitfalls experienced by those who study leadership.
- - - - Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale
        https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8
        
        corporate entrepreneurship is used in a broad sense to include the development and implementation of new ideas into the organization. Using this definition, this study describes an instrument used to empirically identify the internal conditions that influence middle manager's participation in corporate entrepreneurship activities
        
        The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship
        https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1497759
        
        The entrepreneurial event is shaped by groupings of social variables (such as ethnic groups) and the social and cultural environment. The entrepreneurial event is denoted by initiative-taking, consolidation of resources, management, relative autonomy, and risk-taking.
        
        The Socio-Cultural Environment for Entrepreneurship: A Comparison Between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon Countries
        https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490983
        
        This study uses a theory of face to identify predictors of interest in entrepreneurship in six East Asian and four Anglo-Saxon countries. At the cultural level, social status of entrepreneurship and shame from business failure predict interest in entrepreneurship better in East Asian than Anglo countries. At the individual level, social status predicts interest in entrepreneurship in the entire sample.
        
        Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship
        https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496225
        
        Reviews the state of entrepreneurship research from multiple frameworks, including sociological and psychological views of the entrepreneur, economic development, venture capital, and education.
        (1) the entrepreneur (general definitions, psychology and sociology); (2) entrepreneurial technology (small vs. big business, venture and risk capital; (3) progress (economic growth and development, innovation, and environmental factors); (4) academia (methods and directions of research and education); and, finally (5) areas for future study.
- - - - Perspiration and inspiration: Grit and innovativeness as antecedents of entrepreneurial success
        Mooradiana, Matzlerb, Uzelacbc, & Bauer
        https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487016304342#!
        
        Corporate Entrepreneurship & Innovation
        Today's Leadership Challenge
        Donald F. Kuratko
        https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.autorpa.yzu.edu.tw/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118970812.ch14
        
        R.L. Schaumberg, F.J. Flynn Self-reliance: a gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations
        Acad. Manag. J., 60 (2017), pp. 1859-1881
        https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85027443018&origin=inward&txGid=ad455e930a45fb46303e859b845e7811
        
        Character strengths in organizations(Article)
        Peterson, C., Park, N.
        {We propose that strengths of character are a neglected but critically important resource for organizations}
        
        Self-reported creative ability and the dark triad traits: an exploratory study
        
        P.I. HupalonThinking Like an Entrepreneur: How to Make Intelligent Business Decisions That Will Lead to Success in Building and Growing Your Own Company
        
        1 more item...