Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive
breeding and…
Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive
breeding and restoration programmes (Leberg & Firmin, 2008)
-
-
Environment and Purging
-
alleles that become fixed in one environment during purging might have deleterious effects in other environment
if husbandry is improved, fitness might improve
environment variations can play another play in assessing the efficiency of by giving the appearance of purging when little loss of deleterious recessive may have occured
-
-
Stocks originated from a common source with utilisation of virgin offspring and randomly selected adult founders
H0: There is no differences in population growth among bottleneck history treatments based on relatedness of founding individuals
Experimental design
Both control and single bottleneck treatments with 6 populations, each represented by 2 mesocosms
Only 2 original lineages retained, each in serial bottleneck treatment represented in 12 mesocosms
-
If purging affects inbreeding depression,
-
Smallest differences in population growth founded with siblings and non-siblings in serial bottleneck
-
- Background on Inbreeding Depression
○ Inbreeding depression significantly impacts the evolution and viability of small populations.
○ It leads to reduced fitness due to increased homozygosity of deleterious alleles.
○ Purging refers to the elimination of harmful alleles from a population, potentially improving overall fitness.
○ It can be especially relevant in the context of small populations that have experienced prior inbreeding.
- Challenges and Uncertainty
○ There remains considerable uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of purging in influencing inbreeding depression and overall population viability.
○ The variability in outcomes associated with purging highlights the complexities of genetic management.
○ To review issues affecting how small populations (from captive breeding and wildlife releases) respond to purging.
○ To present experimental findings on whether past bottlenecks can decrease the susceptibility of fish populations to further inbreeding.
Inbreeding
= (Generally) increased probability of relatedness among mating individuals, especially in small populations.
= (also) refer to cases where the relatedness of mates is higher than the average relatedness between random members of a population.
Inbreeding Depression
= refers to the reduced fitness of offspring from related individuals compared to offspring from random matings.
-
Population Viability
= defined as the probability that a population will survive against extinction threats over a specified time period.
Recessive allele
= an allele that only shows its trait when two copies are present (one from each parent). It is hidden when a dominant allele is present.
Dominant allele
= an allele that shows its trait even if only one copy is present. It masks the effect of a recessive allele.
Dominance
= a genetic relationship where one allele (the dominant one) masks the expression of another allele (the recessive one) at the same gene location.
Overdominance
= a situation where the hybrid (heterozygote) has a trait that is stronger or better than either of the two homozygous parents.
-
Purging
= reduces genetic load by exposing harmful recessive alleles to selection when they become homozygous, lowering their frequency in the population.
-
Brief bottlenecks
= refer to temporary reductions in population size, typically involving between 2 and 20 individuals, maintained for only one to three generations.
○ The study addresses a critical gap in understanding how small population sizes influence future viability, particularly within vertebrate species.
○ Insights gained may improve management practices for species conservation and reintroduction efforts.
-
Brief Bottlenecks
Inbreeding depression reduction caused by past bottlenecks in natural population is unreliable since the success rate is inconsistent.
Isolated population is more vulnerable to future inbreeding due to small scale purging despite previous bottlenecks.
Multiple Bottlenecks will not always worsen fitness but rarely restore it to original levels. Genetic randomness during bottlenecks causes varied purging success making outcomes unpredictable.
Limitation of purging is it only effective under specific conditions;
- isolated population
- slow inbreeding
- few harmful alleles
Short bottlenecks & Brief Inbreeding effectively remove lethal recessive genes without fixing many minor bad genes especially if followed by population recovery. Bottleneck size and duration matter since smaller & shorter bottlenecks may not cause enough inbreeding for effective purging unless population sizes are low.
-
Population Viability
Inbreeding may fix deleterious alleles : Even if populations survive purging, harmful but nonlethal alleles can become fixed, reducing long-term viability.
Genetic drift during inbreeding reduces adaptability : Inbreeding often causes loss of genetic variation,thus limiting a population's ability to adapt to environmental changes.
Captive population managers should be cautious : Purged populations may have a reduced capacity to adapt, making purging a risky strategy for conservation and breeding programs.
Purging can threaten population viability : While purging may remove harmful alleles, the process itself can lead to extinction, especially in small or stressed populations.
-
Abstract
Research Focus: Investigates the role of non-native species in influencing priority effects—how the order of species arrival affects community structure.
Methodology: Used large-scale outdoor mesocosms to simulate colonization sequences involving native and non-native fish species in Louisiana wetlands.
-
Findings:
Priority effects were observed: earlier-arriving species affected the success of later-arriving species.
The non-native species (Gambusia) exerted a stronger influence when it arrived first, often reducing abundance or growth of native species.
-
Implication: Non-native species can have asymmetric priority effects, reinforcing their dominance when they establish early.
Conclusion: Priority effects can be a key mechanism by which non-native species gain and maintain dominance in invaded ecosystems.
Conclusion
-
-
-
Environment Matters
The efficiency of purging is context-dependent and may vary under different environmental conditions.
Purging in one environment may not be effective or even harmful in another, particularly for conservation reintroductions.
-
-