• “In Prince, the defendant, Sarah Prince, appealed her conviction under Massachusetts’ child labor laws.54 Prince argued that the child labor laws unconstitutionally interfered with her religious convictions as a Jehovah’s Witness.55 Prince had two children and custody of a third child, all of whom were Jehovah’s Witnesses.56 Prince regularly distributed publications of her faith in Brockton, Massachusetts.57 Despite warnings given by local school authorities that such activity violated child labor laws, her children also occasionally participated in the distributions.”
• “The Court stated at the outset that Prince’s claim implicated not only parental rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, but also First Amendment freedom of religion.61 The coupling of these fundamental rights highlighted the gravity of the issue.”