Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Väärälle tiedolle, propagandalle ja extremelle / ideologioille…
Väärälle tiedolle, propagandalle ja extremelle / ideologioille altistuminen somessa
how filtered information and propaganda affect young people’s opinions, and also feeling of safety and general security
1.4.How are disinformation, propaganda, and deviant behaviour and ideologies present in young
people’s social media groups? Who are the most vulnerable targets?
Aikaisempi tutkimus
Agarwal & Bandeli (2018). Somea, esim blogeja käytetään paljon propagandan levittämiseen, feikkiuutisten ja huijausten jakamiseen
Esim: Kun blogeja luetaan paljon, eikä mainstream mediaa, tieto saattaa tulla toisen käden kautta ja totuutta on esimerkiksi muunneltu.
Väärä tieto jaetaan, farther, faster, deeper and more broadly than the truth, especially news regarding politics. Näitä jakaa vielä nimenomaan ihmiset, ei niinkään robotit (Vosougi et al. 2017).
Harva vierailee feikkiuutissivustoilla, suurin osa feikkiuutisista on peräisin nimenomaan some sivustoilta (SNS) (Nelson et al 2018), a heavy Facebook user is far more likely to encounter fake news than a lighter Facebook user. we indeed find the fake news audience comprises a small, disloyal group of heavy Internet users
-
-
-
Rapp 2018: The conun- drum is that even when people possess useful knowledge, and even when they hold well-intentioned, well-practiced epistemic mindsets, they can still be influenced by inaccurate information.
Tämä hyvä aasinsilta siihen ongelmaan, toimiiko medialukutaito vai ei?
-
-
NICHE
Eurobarometer 464 2018: A large majority of respondents think that the existence of fake news is a problem in their country,
at least to some extent (85%).
(Al Rawi 2018)The empirical study of fake news discourse is still under-researched, and this study is expected to fill a gap in literature on this area of research
Notley (2018) Ei oo tutkimusta, minkälaisia kokemuksia nuorilla on valheelliselle tiedolle altistumisesta
(Vosoughi et.al) Studies about the spread of misinformation were limited to analyses of small, ad hoc samples. Yet, almost no studies comprehensively evaluate differences in the spread of truth and falsity across topics nor do they examine why false news may spread differently than the truth. That was our goal.
To understand the spread of false news, our research examines the diffusion of true and false news on Twitter.
Twitter ja esim facebook hyviä alustoja nopean tiedon jakamisen internetissä (Vosougi et al 2017),
Twitterissä ollut esim yli 70 miljoonaa feikkikäyttäjää (Forno 2018).
The best protection against this depends on users’ own action and knowledge. (Forno 2018) This is particularly important for adolescents who are constructing their identities and worldviews (Wilska et al 2018).