Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
After Hegemony : Ch 4 (Harmony : when actors pursuit of self-interested…
After Hegemony : Ch 4
Harmony : when actors pursuit of self-interested policies automatically facilitaties the attainment of other goals
Cooperation : when actors adjust their behaviour to actual/ anticipated preferences of others through policy coordination
Discord : actors do not adjust their behaviour
-
-
Main Arguments :
- cooperation is possiblw aftr hedgemnoy, not only because shared interests can lead to creation of regimes, but also because the conditions for maintanence of existing regimes are less demanding than those required for creating them
- any act of cooperation needs to be interpreted with the context of related actions and prevailing expectations and shared beliefs before
An American Example :
- US no longer has capabilities or will to dominate intl politics
-
Objections :
- is harmony a good thing ?
- variance in definitions (takes old terms and gives them a more ideological/realist definition)
(ex : the old and new definition of cooperation)
- ideological perspectives
- modern reality
-
pp.50 in the domestic setting you have police, what does the intl system have ?
- sanctions
pp. 62 soverignity and self help
pp.63
-
Chapter 5
pp 68 - 69. Realist will use the prisoners dilema to show that cooperation is impossible
ex : trade, nuclear disarmetn
Kohane doesnt think this is the best way to becasue it is only single-play. We never see the repercautions of cooperating or defect
better representation of world politics is iterated Prisoners Dilemma, where you play over and over and everyne remembers what you done. The cost of cooperation and deffecting changes (it increseases). In the longterm the better startegy is cooperation. The short term stategy defection
pp 78 argument summary middle of the pp, it is rationale to cooperate even without a world police