Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Paradigm development associated with power ((Pfeffer, 1993)…
Paradigm development
associated with power
(Pfeffer, 1993)
(1)Technical certainty
(2)
consensus
Invisible college
, dense and cross-organizational network of scholars, highly coded and territorialized, well organized
otherwise, theoretical dissensus
Sources of consensus:
develop and maintain theoretical and methodological standards
Vesting authority in elites, field goalkeepers
Organizational studies traditional/emerging values
inclusiveness
theoretical diversity
representativeness
Methodological diversity
emerging goal
: engagement in political strategies for career advancement
instead of quality of work
Particularistic criteria
Social ties
Sharing affiliation, member appointment..
Position within professional association
Pfeffer claims
(1) fields of study are different in the level of development
(2) that (1) has severe consequences and important outcomes (table 1)
Dispersion in funding across departments; dispersion in talent
Connection between productivity and pay
Resource allocations including funding levels of departments
Connection between wage dispersion and job satisfaction
Journal rejection rates
Connection between social ties and the National Science Foundation's grant allocations
Department head turnover or average tenure
Connection between social ties and journal publications
Governance of academic departments
Connection between social ties and editorial board appointments
Time to publication for research
Power of fields and departments and salary paid to faculty
Cross-citation practices among fields
Working collaboratively rather than alone on research