Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Social Psychology: Social influence revision (Conformity (Types of…
Social Psychology: Social influence revision
Obedience
Milgram
Explanations for obedience
Variables affecting obedience
Conformity
Types of conformity
Compliance
Public behaviour is different from private opinion but agrees to avoid disapproval while personal opinion is different
Identification
conformity to social role = pick up beliefs + behaviours of group that you belong to BUT can change if you leave said group
Internalisation
Private opinion reflects public behaviour = new opinion becomes part of value system
Explanations for conformity
Informational Social influence
Research
Jenness
Ambiguous situation = how many jellies in a jar
Originally had to estimate on their own
then shared thoughts in group
group came up with group estimate
Individual estimate again
individual estimate tended to change more to group estimate second time + believed that = internalisation
Abraham et al.
Only influenced by people in unambiguous situations that we identify w/ e.g. friends
Evaluation
evolutionary basis = looking to others in dangerous situation is survival factor
Jenness was laboratory experiment = lacks ecological validity
Jenness may have involved NSI as well
Copy behaviour of group b/c they think they know what they are doing = applies to new situations
Normative social influence
Research and evaluation is Asch
Yielding to pressure of group to be liked/accepted = links with compliance
Asch
Outline
Unambiguous situation = which degree ppl would conform to majority when answer obviously wrong
123 males in group of confederates w/ only one being pp unknowingly
standard line w/ 3 comparisons + had to say which matched standard
Confederates went 1st + pp went last
18 trials: 12 critical and 6 control
Findings
error rate in control group = 0.04% (low)
32% conformity w/ 75% conforming at least once
25% never conformed
Most conformed publically but not privately = NSI
Evaluation
Positives
Easily replicated = paradigm
did debriefing to see if pps were psychologically well = ethical
Practical application: advertisors use fact that ppl conform to peers + buy what they recommend
Negatives
laboratory study
deception = unethical
only one at a time = uneconomical
50s = Mcarthyism
Androcentric sample b/c all men
Variables affecting conformity
Asch
Individual variables
Conformity to social roles
Zimbardo
Minority influence
Consistency
Flexibility
Other factors
Roles of social influence processes in social change
Explanations for resisting social influence
Social support
Locus of control
Other factors