Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Should vaccinations be mandatory? (YES (Adverse reactions rare (CDC and…
Should vaccinations be mandatory?
YES
Save children's lives
90-99% effective
Ingredients in save amounts
Medical organisations : safe
Adverse reactions rare
CDC and FDA
Extremely rare
Protect the ''herd''
95%
Non vaccinated threat
Save time and money
Protect future generations
Help eradicating
Birth defects
Eradicating diseases
Smallpox
Not disappeared
Monster kept at bay
According to the CDC
Economic benefits for society
$1.38 trillion ''Societal costs''
NO
Serious and fatal side effects
Harmful ingredients
Own choice - not government
Infringe upon religions
Immoral / objectionable ingredients
Aborted fetuses
Religions
Animal products
Vegans
Unnatural
Natural immunity better
Pharmaceutical companies not to be trusted
Make profit
Diseases disappeared
Diseases harmless
Chickenpox
Misguided concerns
Autism
Don't witness effects --> not needed
WHY
Most effective
Resurgence if rate drops
Benefit not seen
Measles broken out in Western countries
Not allow to be threatened
WHAT WE KNOW
Obligated in America
Exemptions religion
Exemption rate increased
No vaccination till school
Vulnerable babies
Vaccin exemption cluster geographically
Dangerous --> Bigger risk
More homeschooling
Strictest states --> Whooping cough and measles lowest
Australia
Immunisation schedules attached
to childcare payments
148.000 children vaccinated
Exemptions removed (jan 2016)
OPTIONS
Talking to professional
Easy to access
More education
https://www.meningitis.org/blogs/should-vaccination-be-mandatory
https://vaccines.procon.org