Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
2.responsible decision making (justification (denial injury, denial victme…
2.responsible decision making
blind spot
accidental unethical behavior
stanford experiment
importance of context
situational causes negative behavior and change thought
gards abusive authorithy, power,
power of role assignments
why do people make unethical decisions
individual facors
given at birth
age, gender, national,
experience
education, psy, values, moral imaginantion, integrity
HOFSTEDE (individualism, power dist, uncertainty, masculinity, long term, indulgence)
cognitive moral developpement
pre conventioanl
conventioanl
post conventional
situational factors
work context
framing
langage
issue related
reward, autority, culture, national
context related
moral intensity and framing
justification
before decision, during (instinct, quick)and after
the reader, justify behavior
want (decision time) vs should (prediction recollection)
ford pinto case
not recal
criminal behavior lawsuits
cost benefit analysis
ethical decision
alternative course of action open
ethically relevant for at least 1 partie
significant effect on others
model:
reconize issue
make moral jugement
establish moral intent
engage moral behavior
justification
denial injury
denial victme
social weight
higher loyal
denail of resp
methaphor ledger
promote ethical behavior
sanction
moral comprensation
reward
informal systme
separate ethical and unethical, 0 tolerance, ajust
autority and bureacracy
work roles (do what is told)
org norms and culture (own standard in work com)
why ignore unethical of others
motivated bling
indirect blind
slippery slope
outcome focus