Chpt3: Social Cognition (how ppl think abt themselves & the world

Automatic Thinking

Schemas

Def

Which do we use?

Self-fulfilling prophecy

Mental structures that organise our knowledge of the social world

Accessibility

Priming

Diff types of automatic thinking

Automatic Decision Making

Metaphors abt Mind & Body

Automatic Goal Pursuit

Judgemental Heuristics

Representativeness Heuristic

Availability Heuristic

Cultural differences in Social Cognition

content of our schemas is influenced by the culture we live in

Holistic Vs Analytic Thinking

Controlled Thinking

Drawbacks

How to Improve Human Thinking

Def

Counterfactual Thinking

Controlled thinking and Free will

Teach ppl basic statistical and methodological principles on how to reason correctly

Thinking that is nonconscious, unintentional, involuntary and effortless

usefulness

Help us organise and make sense of the world, fill in gaps of our knowledge or else everything you encounter would be confusing

Help us figure out what is going on in ambiguous/confusing situations (eg. description of guest lecturer experiment)

Accessible because related to a current goal (eg. studying for psych exam so you know some info abt abnormal behaviour)

Accessible due to recent experiences (eg. done through priming)

Accessible due to past experiences (eg. alcoholic/mentally ill bus passenger)

Process where recent experiences increase accessibility of a schema, trait or concept

Eg. Memorising list of +ve/-ve words & describing Donald's actions

ppl have expectation abt another person->influences how they treat the person->the person behaves consistently with person's original expectations

Rosenthal & Jacobson's elementary school study

Our nonconscious minds choose the goal for us, deciding based on which goal has been recently activated or primed

eg. spiritual word scrambling task before economic game experiement

Distraction helps make best choice

should still use conscious thought if decision requires simple rules eg. solving math equations

Too much conscious reflection can hinder good decisions

when ppl have a conscious goal

Best choice when spend time thinking consciously abt alternatives THEN distracting themselves

especially when decision requires integrating lots of complex info

scent of cleanliness increases trust, holding hot drinks make ppl perceive others as friendly

Physical sensations can prime a metaphor which influences ppl's judgements

Ppl judge base on how easily they can bring smth to mind

Eg. deducing where a foreigner came from

list 6 or 12 things experiment

Base rate information

Classify smth according to how similar it is to a typical case

East Asian cultures-->holistic thinking style (focus on overall context)

How do these differences originate?

Western cultures-->analytic thinking style (focus on objects instead of surrounding context)

diff philosophical traditions

Western thoughts rooted in Greek traditions of Aristotle and Plato which focus on laws governing objects, independent of context

Eastern thoughts shaped by Confucianism, Taoism, Budhism which emphasise connectedness and relativity of things

Showcased in phototaking study

People in all cultures are capable of thinking holistically/analytically but the environt where they live triggers a reliance on one of the styles

Thinking that is conscious, intentional, voluntary and effortful

underestimate amnt of control we have

the more ppl believe they have free will, the more willing they are to help others and less likely to engage in immoral acts

sometimes we overestimate the amnt of control we have

eg. our conscious thought of getting ice cream could be due to unconscious desires

Eg. communication facilitators unknowingly controlling what the impaired person wants to type

ppl mentally change some aspect of the past to imagine what might have been

can lead to rumination which contributes to depression

or can also motivate ppl to work harder

students in psych and medicine have better reasoning than law and chem students

Address Overconfidence Barriers

get ppl to consider possibility that they might be wrong