Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Traditional Classification of Proposition (Noteworthy examples for…

- - - - predicate of subject
        
        Absolutely
  - - - To expressed condition
  - - - with consequences followed from it
    - - States condition
    - - Expresses Consequence
  - - - at least one of it is true
    - - non exclusive
- - - - Which is determined by copula -i have a pun here
  - - - Hypothetical prop can be classified accordingly
        
        Hypothetical prop
        
        affirmative
        
        consequent follows antecedent (condition)
        
        negative
        
        consequent doesn't follow antecedent (condition)
  - - - Bcoz
        
        Of its non exclusive nature (clarification needed)
- - - - Important: It is used to express quantity as well as quality
    - - posibility
        
        that assertion may be about 'all'
      - Used
        
        When
        
        assertion is about a part
  - - - Whole
        
        subject
        
        Then
        
        universal
        
        Fact: Only , universal when we are certain predicate applies to whole subject
        
        read this with 'some'☝
      - part of
        
        Subject
        
        Then
        
        Particular
  - - - Singular proposition
        
        under the said head
    - - predicate
        
        affirmed or denied
        
        single definite individual
        
        They r universal
        
        bcoz subject term is single individual which is taken under an entire denotation
- - - - Quantity and Quality
    - - Affirmative
        
        Predicate
        
        Affirmed
        
        Of Whole Subject
        
        All S are p
      - Negative
        
        Predicate
        
        Denied
        
        Of Whole Subject
        
        No S are p
    - - Affirmative
        
        Predicate
        
        Affirmed
        
        Of Part of subject
        
        Some S are P
      - Negative
        
        Predicate
        
        Denied
        
        Of Part of subject
        
        Some S are not P
    - - Denoted more Conveniently
        
        As A E I O
        
        U Surely Know this
- - - - So predicate is denied or affirmed of the subject
        
        Hence it is universal
  - - - When
        
        Affirmed
        
        Universal Affirmative
        
        Denied
        
        Particular Negative
        
        Conceptual Data
        
        Bcoz
        
        'All not'
        
        1 more item...
- - - - mean 'any' or 'all'
        
        Reduce to form of 'A proposition'
        
        Sentence must be affirmative
      - mean 'one thing'
        
        Reduce to form of 'E proposition'
- - - - Hence Universal in nature
        
        A and E - depending , on situation
        
        Affirmative - A prop, Negative - E prop
  - - - Bcoz , predicate is denied of subject
  - - - I and O - depending, on situation
        
        Occurring in affirmative sentence - I prop and contrary for O prop
  - - - Particular Proposition
        
        I and O -depending, on proposition
  - - - It has negative significance
        
        Means - ' Some not'
      - Occurs in a negative sentence
        
        Reduced to form of I proposition
    - - Different from 'few'
        
        It has positive force
      - Reduce to form of I and O - depending, on situation
- - - - Because of universal force , reduce it to universal proposition.