Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Libertarianism (NOZICK's principle of justice (Principle of…
-
-
- only protection against force, theft and fraud
- any more extensive state will violate person's rights not to be forced to do certain things, and is unjustified
- a person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding
- a person who acquires a holding in according with the principle of transfer, from someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled to that holding
- justifies creation of private property
- consent? transfer is justified
- no one is entitled to a holding exempt by application 1 and 2
- when we mix our labor with previously owned object - makes that object our property
- there should be enough and as good left in common for others
Dividing the commons - making plots of private property - really improves our worlds - connect individuals responsibility
-
-
-
-
-
- Whatever arises from a just situation by just steps is itself just
- irrelevant that people have different preferences and talents
- only thing that matters is self-ownership and property that arises from self-ownership
- circumstances are morally arbitrary
- not automatically entitled to fruits of their labor
- might subject to taxation >> DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE
- starts from self-ownership - no one allowed to interfere = ABSOLUTE = minimal state (criminal law; no welfare state