A Utopia?
This book depicts a failure of utopia. The Urrasati idea of utopia is largely characterized by wealth, luxury, and excess, which are representations of extreme materialism and vanity. This ideal view of utopia is very different--almost the opposite of that--from the Anarresti ideal of a society founded on principles of equality, rejection of the ego, and communal living, which is justified by Shevek's words "nothing is yours. It is to use. It is to share. If you will not share it you cannot use it” (Chapter 2). From the standard of nowadays' utopia, Anarres fits perfectly. However, as Shevek dives deeper into his research, he gradually came to the idea that Bedap suggests, which is there is an unseen government in Anarres, led by authoritarians who don't even know they are. It turns out that Anarres is still on the way of finding the true utopia.
-
How much does the organization of a society affect the good life? Shevek is still dissatisfied ostensibly in utopia, suggesting that the kind of society one lives in is never enough. Shevek is looking at Urras, and also Anarres. They spatially confronts each other just like how we also confront our own idealism.