gap in literature between community gardening and guerilla gardening

how will the resultant knowledge be disseminated? How will stakeholders be given access to learnings?

are you taking stock of potential harms to collaborators and/or to participants or their community, and avoiding these?

do you have collaborators from the community most affected? What are their roles, their decision-making powers and the benefits they may enjoy from involvement?

how are you building/earning/sustaining trust in the affected communities?

who will likely share personal, professional or financial or other benefits?

focusing on the possibility of community gardens, and why this is inadequate

as battersby says "getting good and reliable data is often difficult, especially about taboo and illegal activity"