Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
(Rousseau, Burke) - Coggle Diagram
Rousseau
-
Human's are naturally free in nature, it is only once we become social beings that unfreedom begins to emerge. TO this end, our social relations fix our moral orientation
once propelled into a social state R posits that men "slowly came together and united into different bands, eventually forming in each country a particular nation, united by mores... not by regulations and laws" 73
But through customs and conventions generate a moral competition between individuals in society, with individuals beginning to look at others and want to be looked at themselves, generating public esteem p73
R posits our conventions generate "vanity and contempt on the one hand, and shame and envy on the other" concluding that from "the fermentation caused by these new leavens eventually produced compounds fatal to happiness and innocence" p73
emergence of AP
we're all locked in the struggle for amour propre and esteem. we all want to be seen in the eyes of others
R is drawing our attention to a new psychological need for humans, one we didn’t have in our original state, one anothers affirmation, respect, and esteem (lec three)
AP alone is not enough to create unfreedom, rather the mores generated by it provide a source for unfreedom insofar as they create corrupted systems of dependence
R nevertheless refuses to draw the conclusion that AP is necessarily a (rousseau word), instead hinting at the possibility for AP to embody a (R word). This project of properly guiding AP is illustrated in the SC and shall be briefly touched on below.
-
-
Burke
source
Burke posits the opposite of R, our received customs actually contribute to our freedom and happiness
To Burke, freedom is anchored in a system of well regulated mores. Our freedom is guided by the wisdom and mores handed down to us. It is a “manly, moral, and regulated” liberty that is the difference between licentious freedom and proper, guided freedom that balances self-interest with self-restraint through manners and mores. If liberty gives us license, then mores give us limits and regulation.
our freedom does not come from abstract a priori reasoning, they are inherited. Passed down from the dead, and held by the living in trust for those who have yet to be born
-