Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

II - FEEDBACK TO TEAM, III- FUTURE, I - INTRO - Coggle Diagram

- - - - It depends on what they can do, but they often mention that they need more connection with their M and HM
  - - - idea of keeping the regional specificities, but also of encouraging the creation of means (whatsapp groups, regional mailing lists...)
      - improve the communication of the global Consortium Secretariat and Council to the local level.
        
        improving ownership and trust
- - - - VISION 10 YEARS storytelling, advocacy, etc.
    - - Need for Members to access to and understanding of international law and policy and tools for advocacy,
      - VISION 10 YEARS: the ICCA Consortium should maintain its role of a nexus for collaboration across continents, between individuals and organisations, to safeguard territories of life. It should continue to be the movement that is elaborating documentation on Territories of life, ranging from joint scientific publications to policy documents to national legislation reforms and others.
    - - Peer and intergenerational learning and exchanges (selected by 79 Members)
      - Fundraising support (selected by 75 Members)
      - Networking and partnership building support (selected by 74 Members)
      - Research, analysis and communications support (selected by 72 Members)
      - Solidarity, advocacy and campaign support (selected by 71 Members)
      - Legal and policy support (selected by 66 Members)
      - Methodological or facilitation support with self-strengthening processes (selected by 65 Members)
      - more exchanges, including in-person
      - strengthen the institutionalisation of the Consortium
      - Are these expected results? :question:
    - - rather working at strengthening/self strengthening than emergency responses
      - SSP
      - support and creation of ICCA networks
      - transfer of knowledge
      - National advocacy
      - VISION 10 YEARS ICCAs are fully recognised and are secured
    - - Documenting ICCAs theme
        
        including the registration in the WCMC registry
      - Sustaining theme
        
        especially in covid context
      - Defending theme
      - VISION 10 YEARS:be the body of resources for the support, the creation, the defence, and the management of ICCAs, including money.
  - - - In the forthcoming HM review: look more into the identity and constituency of both to see why there is this feeling. Why would HM be more involved than M? :question:
    - - greater and clearer role for communities
      - improving clarity at the regional level
      - clearly define the services provided by the Consortium
- - - - Many are both IPLC and NGO
      - The new categorisation fo the MP&P will help us define which one are considered as grassroots
      - A bit more than half IPLC org represent a network of several IPLC groups
        
        considered as priviledged types of Members (it is easier t understand the Consortium)
  - - - A strong sense of collective
      - The determination of Members
      - Encountering outstanding individuals
- - - - Maybe it is a question to ask to reg coordo?
  - - - Note that only 7 M mentionned clearly "strengthening ICCAs"... What does it means for us? Is it something we (everybody) had expected and that does not come clearly? :question:
- - - - May it be feeling solidarity (meeting others, sense of belonging)
      - May it be pride and legitimacy (by linking with others, receiving the visits, being invited to int events
      - may it be the pragmatic support for self strengthening processes
      - may it be by having the chance to understand the assests of teh Consortium