Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
critique of the article, oral + listening = significace contributed to up…
critique of the article
objective
the association between health literacy and breast and cervical cancer screening
now thet are using a probbalityl sample ( random sample from the behavioral risk factor survallance system (BRFSS)
represesnts the population. secondary data anaylysis
secondary data analysis
pro
cons
background
they was used from non probablitiy sample
methods
cross-sectional crrelation study
health literacy survey with 3 main questions pertaining to, with also
oral ( asing for medical advice)
listening( understanding informtion that providers offer)
written ( understanding printed health info )
general demographics
anaylysis
multiple logistic regression for ..
results
oral
oral + listening = significace
contributed to up-to date screening
breast cancer screening
oral + listenign + written = NO sig for update screening
listening
written
discussion
oral + listening = signficance for upto date breast and cervical screening
BUT we need to not let health literacy determine health outcomes all together
HCP must reduce health literacy demands by increase effective communitcation and informed decision making
oral + listening = significace contributed to up-to date screening
cervical cancer screening
ORAL -listening -written = significance