Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
🧱 2️⃣ 📖 1️⃣ - Coggle Diagram
🧱 2️⃣ 📖 1️⃣
🔑 leadership traits
Determination
Pursuit of 🥅
Get the job done
Persistence
Dominance
Drive
Task completion
Responsibility
Exercise initiative in social situation
Self-confidence
Different in
Women
Men
Ethnicity
Culture
Age
Take respnbibility
Integrity
Honest
Trustworthy
Willingness
Intelligence
Higher
Then non-leaders
#
But not too
Lead to problems
#
Helps acquire skills
Perceptional
Reasoning
Verbal
Complex problem solving
Making judgments
Sociablity
#
Outgoing
Courteous
Friendly
Tactful
Diplomatic
Sensitive
Others needs
Develop
Good interpersonal skills
Create
Co-operative Relationships
Studies
Stogdill (1974)
Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991)
Northhouse (2016)
Lord et al (1986)
Zaccaro et al (2004)
Becoming a leader
No set way
Drawn to potential
Personality traits
View of other
Managers also leaders?
Favour difference
Zaleznik (1977)
Managers
Embrace process
Seek stability & control
instinctively resolve problems quickly
Before fully understanding
Leaders
Tolerate chaos
Lack structure
Delay closure
To fully understand
Kotter (1990)
Managers
Organising
Controlling
Planning
Leaders
Establishing
Direction
Aligning
Motivation
Too much for 1️⃣🧍♀️
Need separate roles
For org to flourish
Bennis & Gill (2006)
Manager
Asks
How
When
Imitates
Short-range view
Accepts staus quo
Focus on
Structure
Control
Systems
Classic "good soldier"
Maintains
Does things right
A "copy"
Administers
Leaders
Focus on people
Inspires trust
Develops
Long-range perspective
A "original"
Asks
What
Why
Innovates
Originates
Challenges stats quo
Own person
Does the right thing
Favour as a single group
Creates unhelpful distinction
Managers do some leadership tasks
& vice versa
Collective working
#
Not relient on others
Not expected someone else will do it
Effective leader
Not all are
Difficult to find
Qualitative data
Effective measure
Criteria
Who is effective
Rosenzweig (2014)
Warns against
Simplistic measures
Halo effect
Generalise feelings
All relationship areas
Extends to all business areas
Measure
Perception
Followers
Other Leaders
Antonakis et al (2010)
Problematic
#
One thing leads to another
#
🔑 follower traits
Critical thinking
Low
High
Participation
Active
Passive
Kelley (1988, 2008)
Follower types
Alienated followers
#
#
Cynical
Oppose leaders efforts
Disgruntaled acquiescence
Lack
#
High
Big 5️⃣
Neuroticism
Evident to org
Contested change
Diagnose risks & challenges
Challenge leader
But only in conversation with other followers
Rarely talke action on own views
Survivors
In the middle
Live by
Better safe then sorry
Adept at surviving change
High
#
#
Focus
Own survival
Not wider objectives
Issues with
#
Yes 👨🏻🦰👩🏼🦰
#
#
AKA
Conformist followers
Livlier
But unenterprising
Dependant for inspiration
Agressively differential
Lack
#
#
Determind to follow the leader
High
#
Big 5️⃣
Agreeableness
Effective followers
#
#
Close to demonstarting
#
Follower who are also leaders
May lack
#
#
#
Not certain
Think for themselves
Energetic
Assertive
🐑
#
#
Lack
#
#
#
#
Initiative
Complete task then 🛑
Previousely
Uniformly followed orders
Ignored channleneges
Assumed
More recent
Destructive impact
Contibute to success
Follower/ leader relationship
Personality traits universal?
Evidence
Women perceived differently
Schien (1973)
Assumptions
Unconcious bias
Countries/ cultures
Different emphasis on personality traits
House et al (2002)
Dark side of leadership
Ineffective
Kellerman (2005)
Incompetent
Intemperate
Ridgid
Destructive
Kellerman (2005)
Corrupt
Insular
Callous
Evil
Padilla et al (2007)
Toxic triangle
Susceptual followers
Conductive environment
Destructive leaders