Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy (GTG 21 - Nov 2016)

Epidemiology

Ectopic: Any pregnancy implanted outside the endometrial cavity

Incidence: 11/1000 (11,000 per annum)

Incidence in women attending EPAU: 2-3%

Risk factors: Tubal damage following surgery or infection, smoking, IVF, majority no identifiable risk factor

Tubal Ectopic

Transvaginal ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice for tubal ectopic pregnancies
Sensitivity: 87-99%
Specificity: 94-99%

Identified by visualising an adnexal mass that moves separate to the ovary

Laparoscopy NOT gold standard for diagnosis (false negatives 3-4.5% when performed too early)

50-60% of cases: Inhomogeneous or noncystic adnexal mass
20-40% of cases: Empty extrauterine gestational sac
15-20% of cases: Extrauterine gestational sac containing a yolk sac and/or embryonic pole +/- cardiac activity

Early IUP: Intradecidual and double decidual signs
Intradecidual sign: Fluid collection with an echogenic rim located within a markedly thickened decidua on one side of the uterine cavity
Double decidual sign: Intrauterine fluid collection surrounded by two concentric echogenic rings
20% of cases: Pseudosac (collection of fluid within uterine cavity)
NEED TO DISTINGUISH PSEUDOSAC FROM EARLY GESTATIONAL SAC

Free fluid: Not diagnostic
Echogenic fluid: 28-56% of ectopic pregnancies (commonly due to blood leaking from fimbrial end of tube)

Cervical Ectopic

Rare; <1% of all ectopic pregnancies

Progesterone: NOT useful
BHCG: Useful for planning management of ultrasound visualised ectopic pregnancy; key prognostic indicator for success of conservative management

Ultrasound criteria

  1. Empty uterus
  2. Barrel-shaped cervix
  3. Gestational sac present below the level of the internal cervical os
  4. Absence of sliding sign
  5. Blood flow around gestational sac using colour Doppler

Sliding sign: Distinguishes cervical ectopics from miscarriages within the cervical canal. When pressure is applied to the cervix using a probe, in a miscarriage, the gestational sac slides against the endocervical canal, but it does not in an implanted cervical pregnancy.

Single serum BHCG should be carried out at diagnosis
BHCG >10,000 is associated with decreased chance of successful methotrexate treatment

Caesarean Scar Ectopic

Definition: Implantation into the myometrial defect at the site of the previous uterine incision
Prevalence: 1/2000 pregnancies (13% misdiagnosed at presentation)

First-line: Transvaginal/transabdominal ultrasound
Second-line: MRI if diagnosis equivocal


Ultrasound criteria

  1. Empty uterus
  2. Gestational sac or solid mass of trophoblast located anteriorly at the level of the internal os, embedded at the site of the previous scar
  3. Thin or absent layer of myometrium between gestational sac and bladder
  4. Prominent trophoblastic/placental circulation on Doppler
  5. Empty endocervical canal

No need for biochemical investigations for diagnosis

Interstitial Ectopic

Ultrasound criteria

  1. Empty uterus
  2. POC/gestational sac located laterally in the interstitial/intramural part of the tube and surrounded by <5mm of myometrium in all imaging planes
  3. Interstitial line sign: Thin echogenic line extending from the central uterine cavity echo to the periphery of the interstitial sac (sensitivity 80%, specificity 98%)

Definition: Implantation in the interstitial part of the fallopian tube (interstitial part is 1-2cm in length)
Incidence: 1.0-6.3% of ectopic pregnancies

3D ultrasound and MRI may help with diagnosis

Serum BHCG carried out at diagnosis may aid with management, and may be repeated after 48 hours

Cornual Ectopic

Ultrasound criteria

  1. Visualisation of a single interstitial portion of fallopian tube in the main uterine body
  2. Gestational sac/POC seen mobile and separate from the uterus and completely surrounded by myometrium
  3. A vascular pedicle adjoining the gestational sac to the unicornuate uterus

Definition: Implantation in one horn of a bicornuate uterus, or in one lateral half of a uterus of bifid tendency
Incidence: Very rare; 1/76,000 pregnancies

Serum BHCG carried out at diagnosis may aid with management, and may be repeated after 48 hours

Ovarian Ectopic

No specific agreed criteria for ultrasound diagnosis


Suggestive findings

  1. Empty uterus
  2. Wide echogenic ring with internal anechoic area on ovary
  3. Yolk sac/embryo may be seen
  4. Negative sliding organ sign: Not possible to separate cystic structure or gestational sac from ovary
  5. Separate corpus luteum
  6. Complex echogenic adenxal mass

Abdominal Ectopic

Serum BHCG carried out at diagnosis may aid with management, and may be repeated after 48 hours

Ultrasound criteria

  1. Absence of an intrauterine gestational sac
  2. Absence of both an evident dilated tube and a complex adnexal mass
  3. Gestational cavity surrounded by loops of bowel and separated from them by peritoneum
  4. Wide mobility similar to fluctuation of the sac, evidence with pressure of the probe towards the posterior cul-de-sac

MRI can help confirm diagnosis and plan surgical approach

Elevated serum BHCG in combination with ultrasound findings

Heterotopic Pregnancy

Definition: IUP and co-existing ectopic pregnancy

Consider in the following:

  1. Following ART
  2. IUP with persistent pelvic pain
  3. Persistently raised BHCG following miscarriage or TOP

Serum BHCG is of limited value

Management Principles

Surgical

Medical

Expectant

Laparoscopy > Open

Salpingectomy > Salpingotomy (if healthy contralateral tube)

Clinically stable women with ultrasound diagnosis of
ectopic pregnancy and a decreasing b-hCG level initially <1500

Suitability

  1. Haemodynamic stability
  2. Willingness to attend for follow-up
  3. No known sensitivity to methotrexate
  4. NICE: No significant pain, serum HCG 1500-5000, unruptured ectopic <35mm, no IUP, no fetal cardiac activity

Consider salpingotomy in women with fertility-reducing factors: Previous ectopic, contralateral tubal damage, previous abdominal surgery, previous PID

Salpingotomy: Inform of risk of persistent trophoblast (3.9-11%) with need for BHCG follow-up (7 days after surgery then weekly until negative result), and risk of further treatment with methotrexate or salpingectomy

Single IM methotrexate 50mg
Success rate 65-95%, 3-27% requiring 2nd dose

Repeat serum HCG 48 hours apart: Check that HCG not rising at a rate consistent with viable IUP
DO NOT GIVE AT FIRST VISIT; EXCLUDE VIABLE IUP

Measure BHCG levels on D4 and D7 post-methotrexate: If BHCG decreases by >15% between D4 and D7, then measure weekly until <15, if not then repeat transvaginal ultrasound +/- treatment

Predictors of Success with Methotrexate

  1. Initial BHCG level: Success rates higher with lower BHCG levels. 81-98% if <1000; 38% if >5000.
  2. Ultrasound appearance of ectopic: Presence of yolk sac, fetal pole, and/or cardiac activity are predictors of failure. Success rates higher if no gestational sac seen.
  3. Pre-treatment changes in BHCG level: BHCG increase of 11-20% over 48 hours prior to methotrexate has higher rates of success.
  4. Decrease in BHCG level from D1-D4 after methotrexate: Success rates 88-100% if BHCG decreases post methotrexate; 42-62% if BHCG increases.

Common SE: Flatulence, bloating, elevated liver enzymes, stomatitis
Others: Marrow suppression, pulmonary fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, renal failure, gastric ulceration

Must be willing and able to attend follow-up, have minimal pain, and have low or declining serum BHCG levels

Sucess rates inversely proportional to serum BHCG levels: Lower success rates associated with higher initial BHCG levels

Management

  1. Medical management with methotrexate (91% efficacy)
  2. Surgical management is associated with a high failure rate and should be reserved for those with life-threatening bleeding
  3. Conservative: Absence of fetal cardiac activity, <12 weeks, low serum BHCG levels associated with greater success

Management

  1. Surgical > medical interventions +/- haemostatic measures
  2. Medical (methotrexate either by local injection into gestational sac or systemic IM injection): Trophoblast remains in situ, risk of haemorrhage as retained placental tissue degenerates.
  3. Surgical: Either suction evacuation, hysteroscopic resection, excision as open/laparoscopic/transvaginal procedure. Can be combined with cervical cerclage, Foley catheter insertion, or UAE as addtiional haemostatic measures.
  4. Expectant: Suitable for small, non-viable ectopics and may be considered if the pregnancy is partially implanted into the scar and grows into the uterine cavity.

Management

  1. Conservative: Expectant or pharmacological approach using local or systemic methotrexate. Likely success of conservative measurement determined by initial BHCG level. Expectant is only suitable for women with low or significantly falling BHCG levels in whom addition of methotrexate may not improve outcome.
  2. Surgical: Surgical management by laparoscopic cornual resection or salpingotomy is an effective option. Alternative techniques include hysteroscopic resection under laparoscopic or ultrasound guidance.

Likely success of conservative measurement determined by initial BHCG level

Management

  1. Excision of the rudimentary horn via laparoscopy or laparotomy

Management

  1. Definitive surgical treatment preferred if laparoscopy is required to make a diagnosis. Removal of pregnancy tissue by enucleation or wedge resection is preferred. Oophorectomy may be required if there is co-existing pathology or bleeding.

Management

  1. Surgical: Laparoscopy is safe and effective when diagnosis is made early and site of implantation does not involve a vascular area. Advanced abdominal pregnancy should be managed by laparotomy.
  2. Medical: Systemic methotrexate with ultrasound guided fetocide.

Management

  1. Methotrexate: If IUP is non-viable or TOP.
  2. Local injection of potassium chloride or hyperosmolar glucose with aspiration of sac contents (clinically stable). Ultrasound follow-up necessary to ensrue resolution as BHCG cannot be used. This minimises risk to the IUP.
  3. Surgical: Preferred method if unstable or with easily accessible ectopic (tubal, cervical, interstitial).
  4. Expectant: If pregnancy is non-viable

Other Management

Offer anti-D prophylaxis to all Rhesus negative women having surgical management. Alloimmunisation has been reported and 25% of cases of ruptured tubal ectopic are associated with fetal cells in maternal circulation.

Fertility prospects

Women without a history of subfertility of tubal pathology: No difference in rate of fertility, future tubal ectopic, or tubal patency rates between management methods.

Women with a previous history of subfertility: Treatment of tubal ectopic with expectant/medical management is associated with improved outcomes compared to radical surgery

Methotrexate has no effect on ovarian reserve.
Advise women to wait 3 months after treatment before trying to conceive due to length of time present in some organs and concern for fetal development.

Rate of recurrent ectopic: 18.5%

Single Dose Protocol for Methotrexate
Day 1: Serum BHCG, U&E, LFT, FBC, IM Methotrexate
Day 4: Serum BHCG
Day 7: Serum BHCG
(If decrease <15% from D4-7, repeat TVS and methotrexate if still fulfills criteria for medical management) (If decrease >15% D4-7, repeat BHCG weekly until levels <15)

Contraindications

  1. Haemodynamic instability
  2. Presence of IUP
  3. Breast-feeding
  4. Unable to comply to follow-up
  5. Sensitivity to methotrexate
  6. Chronic liver disease
  7. Immunodeficiency
  8. Peptic ulcer disease
  9. Pre-existing blood dyscrasia
  10. Active pulmonary disease

Risk of miscarriage: 20% in the first trimester

Maternity mortality: 0.2 per 1000