Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
SRL Competitor Analysis & Interfirm Rivalry, attack/ response, G1…
SRL Competitor Analysis & Interfirm Rivalry
Asymmetry
Proposition 4b: 甲attack乙 :forbidden:乙attck甲
Proposition 4b: 甲response乙 :forbidden:乙response甲
Market tension :red_cross:shared markets
Proposition 4a : Unlikely identical
Competitor Analysis
AA V.S UA
Fleet structure
Delta V.S. AA
Specific focal firm
competitor analysis
Implications
market-by-market contrast
multiple-level contrast
Limitations and Futrue directions
entry strategy
existing competitors(article)
potential competitors
rivaly
2 measures
stability of market share/past soial conditions
interdustry longitudinal studies
subjective notion
Validation
propose
if measures correspond to competitive tension
2 measures
resource similarity
low average price
strategy similarity
market commanality
how defender/attacter works
deeper understanding
firm idiosyncracy
market idiosyncracy
2 measures
the strategic-group
self-select
theoretical
Resource similarity
Market commanality
attack/ response
market commonalty
source similarity
market commonalty
v.s
interfirm rivalry
:star:proposition 1a :
high market commonalty
low attack
direct competition
mutual forbearance
risk-averse
:star:proposition 1b :
high market commonalty
need to reponse better
impunity
defend position
response
make the attack less damage
attack
get share from rivalry
reduce rivalry's anticipate return
resource similarity
v.s
interfirm rivalry
:star:proposition 2a :
high resource similarity
low attack
:star:proposition 2b :
high resource similarity
strong attack
when 1.need substantial resource 2.need high organizational adjustment
no countermoves or later
awareness
of defender's
resource similarity
capability of reponding
:star:proposition 3 : market commonalty :check: resourse similarity :green_cross:
strategic group
improve capability
predict
attack/response
motivation
better than capability
ABCD's attack/response
industrial competition
multiple point competition
change market share
dynamicly
G1
IBS3 Evonne
IBS3 Jenny
EIPHD2 Casper
DCH3 Monica
Market Commonality
&
resource similarity
summary
highly
