Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Coercive Federalism - Coggle Diagram
Coercive Federalism
MB
D/F CAP-TAW
14th finance commission
allotted 42% of CG
tax revenues to states
However
accountability initiative´s analysis
state budgets shows
states received only 30%
during 2015-19 period
Cess on Petroleum
centre received 60% tax revenues
only 40% going to states
In 2013-14
ratio was 50-50
15th finance commission
recommended
performance-based sectoral
grants to states
calls out
fundamental tension
in fiscal relations
growing CG intervention
in State and Concurrent Subjects
Challenges
Insufficient
by the general government
revenue mobilization
local bodies affected by
Absence of timely
recommendations by State FC
Inadequate mobilization
property tax revenues
Allocations
incubation of new cities
and shared municipal services
designed to foster
innovation in Urban governance
to transform cities
emphasized
on complex challenges
air quality, drinking water supply,
and solid waste management
BP/GE/IS
Centre can raise tax easily
but states cannot
Intro
CI
GST regime
built on promise
state faced
revenue deficits
after GST´s introduction
centre pay
loss in the first 5 years
States sacrificed
their constitutionally
granted powers of taxation
in national interest